yes yes I know about that

but in ww1 thats what made it worse

Only war helped to reduce revolutionary situation

Yes

No it bankrupted them much more

Yes but they escaped possible revolution in 1914

I do not reject what you talking about

How did they escape possible revolution in 1914?

>In 1914 was rising of strike movement
even in Petersburg were barricades
Which wasn't in 1905

Either way it was in vain

so? what proof is there that the war prevented it?

There was a revolution during the war

Not prevented but postpone

How so?

In 1914 was possibility for revolutionary situation but war directed energy of people in patriotic hysteria which reduced in 1915-1916

People instead struggle with czarist government dyed in fields of battle with same working people

I'll research that, but thanks

Either way it was still in vain

capitalism has industrialized people far better before

And all socialists and liberals supported czarist government only bolsheviks took internationalist position

I dont like the tsar

Nor do I like the commies

nor do I like the current administration and corruption

this is why I dislike russians so much

well one of the reasons

as well as multiple failures

Russia had been modernizing since 1861 (peasant reform) but this created great contradictions so revolution was inevitable

Like I said, I never liked the tsar.

Remnants of feudalism were added by contradictions of bourgeois development

Oh yeah same for all the other times communism has been tried

So there was no possibility for "centrist" development

course there were

you can be centrist and have revolution

That's why provisional governent and all suppoted socrevs and mensheviks failed

What do you think happened in france and america?

they overthrew kings but didnt turn to shit like communism over time

France was very radical

in a good sense

they had napoleon

who made a great empire

@Mr. X because there was no objective causes for communist revolution