Message from @Gray ☭
Discord ID: 463460369420124200
and the songun policy was useful because it meant that if the US invaded the DPRK could destroy all of the US' military sites and Seoul in the span of like 15 minutes
Different places call for different tactics
Either way
That isn’t what we are even talking about. Why does it have to resolve to a military situation?
What’s wrong with a peaceful solution?
We're talking about the US
And NK
With them it's about domination
I’m willing to give NK a chance to redeem itself after it has gone back on its work and different treaties countless of times
lol
Yet you are not willing to do the same
Yeah because the US has a history of over 50 years of doing this
And NK doesn’t have a history of breaking agreements?
In particular, the last instance the US and DPRK tried to do this exact thing
The US broke the agreement
It was agreed under Clinton and then Bush's administration came in and they didn't do anything
So the DPRK went back to doing their thing
Ffs is there a single time that the US did anything right in your book
Within the last 50 years
Just curious now
I tend not to go looking into the past of the US
because shit's fucked
You don’t look at the past of a nation you are criticizing is untrustworthy because of its past
Nice
As in, I don't have a catalogue if their actions spanning 100 years
but I do know enough about their actions interacting with countries and situations that I *am* interested about
and yes, shit's fucked
Just off the top of your head. Can you think of anything the US has done that you don’t hate?
Anything at all
Internationally speaking
well ww2 was neat
took a while
but they did it
oh also they did the new deal
that was smart
can't think of much else tbh
I see
idk, the US is shit and does shit things
it's not alone in that regard
The UK was shit too