They have google earth pictures.

They rely on quantity. The US and the allies rely on quality and technology

Right because that worked well in vietnam and lebanon

There's a reason why the Americans changed tactics to "support rebels"

and the songun policy was useful because it meant that if the US invaded the DPRK could destroy all of the US' military sites and Seoul in the span of like 15 minutes

Different places call for different tactics

Either way

That isn’t what we are even talking about. Why does it have to resolve to a military situation?

What’s wrong with a peaceful solution?

We're talking about the US

And NK

With them it's about domination

I’m willing to give NK a chance to redeem itself after it has gone back on its work and different treaties countless of times

lol

Yet you are not willing to do the same

Yeah because the US has a history of over 50 years of doing this

And NK doesn’t have a history of breaking agreements?

In particular, the last instance the US and DPRK tried to do this exact thing

The US broke the agreement

It was agreed under Clinton and then Bush's administration came in and they didn't do anything

So the DPRK went back to doing their thing

Ffs is there a single time that the US did anything right in your book

Within the last 50 years

Just curious now

idk

I tend not to go looking into the past of the US

because shit's fucked

You don’t look at the past of a nation you are criticizing is untrustworthy because of its past

Nice

As in, I don't have a catalogue if their actions spanning 100 years

but I do know enough about their actions interacting with countries and situations that I *am* interested about

and yes, shit's fucked

Just off the top of your head. Can you think of anything the US has done that you don’t hate?

Anything at all

Internationally speaking

well ww2 was neat

took a while

but they did it

oh also they did the new deal

that was smart

can't think of much else tbh