Read Social Anarchism vs Lifestyle Anarchism by Bookchin

No

Although contemporary ‘primal’ communities have produced strongly etched individuals, the power of custom and the high degree of group solidarity impelled by demanding conditions allow little leeway for expansively individualistic behavior, of the kind demanded by Stirnerite anarchists who celebrate the supremacy of the ego. Today, dabbling in primitivism is precisely the privilege of affluent urbanites who can afford to toy with fantasies denied not only to the hungry and poor and to the ‘nomads’ who by necessity inhabit urban streets but to the overworked employed. Modern working women with children could hardly do without washing machines to relieve them, however minimally, from their daily domestic labors — before going to work to earn what is often the greater part of their households’ income. Ironically, even the collective that produces Fifth Estate found it could not do without a computer and was ‘forced’ to purchase one — issuing the disingenuous disclaimer, ‘We hate it!’[36] Denouncing an advanced technology while using it to generate antitechnological literature is not only disingenuous but has sanctimonious dimensions: Such ‘hatred’ of computers seems more like the belch of the privileged, who, having overstuffed themselves with delicacies, extol the virtues of poverty during Sunday prayers.

Im not a stirner fan nor egoist

Im merely showing the facts about marxism-leninism.

Stop with the facts meme

Its not a meme

its true

Yeah I'm not a Marxist-Leninist and I know it's got some Christian elements

its got a lot of christian elements

But it's still superior to Post-Left Anarchism

Obviously

thats why I dont like anarchism

but its like comparing aids with cancer

Both are shit

Also discussing philosophy with facts is really weird

Marxism isnt a philosophy

its a cult

Marxism is an analysis of the poltical economy

Not a program

No it was a program

It's how you think economy relates to society

mostly in places like china and russia

Yes and its a bad analysis

Marxism is a method of socioeconomic analysis that views class relations and social conflict using a materialist interpretation of historical development and takes a dialectical view of social transformation.

on top of that a cult due to the states

Its not materialistic though

Not it's not, it's respected by many professors

Of course marxism is materialistic

Many professors can become cultists, I dont care

Are you fucking retarded?

No its not

How?

they believe it works and marx is practically their god

Bullshit

same for his works

they treat it as its the word of god or as bibles

Marx was a materialist, he believed there was no difference between body and soul

No he wasnt and theres more to materialism than that

He believed that the economy, how actual things that you can touch trade and not some ideas rule the world

if he was he wouldnt make such bizarre claims and even if he wasnt that doesnt mean marxism is materialist