Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 502466876144615424


2018-10-18 13:00:51 UTC  

ring species don't exist

2018-10-18 13:01:11 UTC  

There wouldn't be a controversy around whether or not neanderthals, for example, were a sub species, if you were right

2018-10-18 13:01:36 UTC  

Just read the bloody wikipedia page at least dude

2018-10-18 13:02:02 UTC  

```
The hierarchy of biological classification's eight major taxonomic ranks. A genus contains one or more species. Intermediate minor rankings are not shown.
In biology, a species is the basic unit of classification and a taxonomic rank, as well as a unit of biodiversity, but it has proven difficult to find a satisfactory definition. ```

2018-10-18 13:02:12 UTC  

neanderthals weren't sub species

2018-10-18 13:02:14 UTC  

dummt

2018-10-18 13:02:44 UTC  

```It is difficult to define a species in a way that applies to all organisms.[33] The debate about species delimitation is called the species problem.[28][34][35][36] The problem was recognized even in 1859, when Darwin wrote in On the Origin of Species:```

2018-10-18 13:02:50 UTC  

lmao

2018-10-18 13:02:59 UTC  

imagine using wikipedia for knowledge

2018-10-18 13:03:00 UTC  

Here's one example that ruins your definition for speciation

2018-10-18 13:03:04 UTC  

read a book cuck

2018-10-18 13:03:06 UTC  

No, no, you misunderstand

2018-10-18 13:03:10 UTC  

your position is so bad that even wikipedia disproves it

2018-10-18 13:03:12 UTC  

that's what's going on here

2018-10-18 13:03:12 UTC  

nope, you did

2018-10-18 13:03:16 UTC  

nope

2018-10-18 13:03:16 UTC  

Anyway, here's an example:

2018-10-18 13:03:24 UTC  

wikipedia is written by newbs

2018-10-18 13:03:43 UTC  

Organisms which reproduce asexually: Is each individual of an asexually reproducing kind of life, a unique species?

2018-10-18 13:03:46 UTC  

Because they can't interbreed

2018-10-18 13:03:58 UTC  

no one with accomplishments in their field would write an article in Wikipedia

2018-10-18 13:04:05 UTC  

no they would write a ffucking book

2018-10-18 13:04:21 UTC  

So obviously there's more to speciation than just breeding capacity

2018-10-18 13:04:23 UTC  

It's about traits, too

2018-10-18 13:04:31 UTC  

nope

2018-10-18 13:04:43 UTC  

all of this text on this page has sources from books btw

2018-10-18 13:04:46 UTC  

so there you have your precious books

2018-10-18 13:04:48 UTC  

fake news

2018-10-18 13:04:59 UTC  

```Natural hybridisation presents a challenge to the concept of a reproductively isolated species, as fertile hybrids permit gene flow between two populations. For example, the carrion crow Corvus corone and the hooded crow Corvus cornix appear and are classified as separate species, yet they hybridise freely where their geographical ranges overlap.[60]```

2018-10-18 13:05:03 UTC  

lol

2018-10-18 13:05:04 UTC  

fake news

2018-10-18 13:05:12 UTC  

Fake news because you don't like what it says

2018-10-18 13:05:18 UTC  

A true liberal badass right here, lads

2018-10-18 13:05:36 UTC  

fake news

2018-10-18 13:06:02 UTC  

Species is just a word used to describe certain levels of genetic similarity

2018-10-18 13:06:10 UTC  

It doesn't have a fixed, rigorous definition that always works

2018-10-18 13:06:29 UTC  

It doesn't change anything if bantu and Scandinavians are the same species, or aren't

2018-10-18 13:06:32 UTC  

things are what they are anyway

2018-10-18 13:06:36 UTC  

nope

2018-10-18 13:06:36 UTC  

what ever you call them

2018-10-18 13:06:42 UTC  

it's pretty fucking right imo