Message from @Borzo
Discord ID: 503908956616261633
Im not middle class, Im upper
Bourgeois stays the same in plural
Good luck delude
@Mr. X I bet you have never worked a day of labour in your entire life
Not yet no, Im currently unemployed
That's what I fucking thought
Lazy bourgeois bastard
That's not how capitalism works
Im not bourgeois
Im upperclass
Im not lazy. retard lol
>never worked a day in life
>I'm not lazy retard
Mhm
Im studying first
do you know anything about education and getting a job?
Like a good job?
Already have both
Mhm
The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its complement vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital.
On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie. But this state of things finds its complement in the practical absence of the family among the proletarians, and in public prostitution.
"The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its complement vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital."
Nope
And the bourgeois is middle class not upper class
Im upper class
all 3 classes are based on capital
"Middle class owner of property"
Im upper class
This does not mean middle class overall
Yes, Im upper class
You can be upper class and be a middle class owner of property
No you cant
But don’t wrangle with us so long as you apply, to our intended abolition of bourgeois property, the standard of your bourgeois notions of freedom, culture, law, &c. Your very ideas are but the outgrowth of the conditions of your bourgeois production and bourgeois property, just as your jurisprudence is but the will of your class made into a law for all, a will whose essential character and direction are determined by the economical conditions of existence of your class.
you're an upper class owner of property if that's the case
brb
I don't own any private property, so no
The selfish misconception that induces you to transform into eternal laws of nature and of reason, the social forms springing from your present mode of production and form of property – historical relations that rise and disappear in the progress of production – this misconception you share with every ruling class that has preceded you.
I never said you were, I was giving an example
What you see clearly in the case of ancient property, what you admit in the case of feudal property, you are of course forbidden to admit in the case of your own bourgeois form of property.
What is this tldr bs?
its just spam at this point