https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Skvortsov-Stepanov

And what did you prove by those 3 pics?

Let’s see

Date of October revolt.

Ok

There were 12 jews in 1907 so before the revolution

So sad

Random pic ok

And guy who was in power for 3 days.

I have been destroyed.

Lol, you dont even get that one date comes before the other so showing a earlier date doesnt proves anything as it is proir to the revolution.

And the img does shows that the jew influance increased after.

Then. the list of "non jews" had ivan in that list, and he is clearly a jew

And where do you see "There were 12 jews in 1907 "

It doesnt says that, you dont even know how to read

Press @Cem to pay respects

@no passaran! Why did you make up a guy? "And guy who was in power for 3 days." Is this your imaginary friend?

You send some random dude who did shit for 3 days

And from where did you get that he was a Jew?

12 jews

Do you even read your own bullshit?

Or do you just shit it out?

And yes I’m asking why did you send some random graph from 1907

@Offender

Look a collum over to the right you dumbfuck

If you would have said 12% then yeah, but your stupid ass didnt noticed that there are 11 more in the opposition

fuck you are stupid

Which guy !!!!

All you say is "in office for 3 days" Not revering to which guy, on top of that saying that "the guy" was only in office for 3 days has no relevance in any manner. **which guy?**

1 that was 11% not 12%

That was 12 jews

And the guy you send

You sent one (1) dude

Figure it out by yourself

hERE IS THE THING, YOU SAID HE WAS IN POWER FOR 3 DAY. Which you just made up as it isnt true , he had a long career in politics.
And like i said you just made a strawmen argument not relating to the point. Just because he is in power for 3 days doesnt means anything. Further more he served for much longer then 3 days which you claim he does, hence the convusion.

Another strawmen you give, Just because he was "doing shit" as you say for 3 days doesnt excludes him from being in the government for longer .

Now considering so far i havent seen 3 days or the source of the image of your "3 days" so maybe you should have given it. You expect ppl to be clairvoyant and know what random thing you looked at and are now talking about

Now This dude, isnt a random dude. He is one of the names of your img, which states that he is not a jew

But as you can see on the photo. he is a jew .

As for your bad math. I used 12% as you said it was 12 jews in politics, when you didnt even noticed the other colum. Now you are trying to argue semantics on %