Message from @Jake_Woods_153

Discord ID: 412080998096830465


2018-02-11 02:59:53 UTC  

Not at all.

2018-02-11 03:00:05 UTC  

Only in wartime does freezing government assets cause a major problem.

2018-02-11 03:00:21 UTC  

by freezing gouvernment assets you would directly affect the lives of 10's of millions of people

2018-02-11 03:00:36 UTC  

Currently, all banking institutions do not have any direct investments that would cause a collapse.

2018-02-11 03:00:36 UTC  

How many folks in here are trololol?

2018-02-11 03:00:44 UTC  

Everything is now indirect.

2018-02-11 03:01:00 UTC  

Which means freezing all of them will not harm the public.

2018-02-11 03:01:01 UTC  

<@237954551062200322> how will you reorganize your new society

2018-02-11 03:01:11 UTC  

no but if you froze all of chinas assets it would cause a major famine

2018-02-11 03:01:20 UTC  

re

2018-02-11 03:01:23 UTC  

You can keep the indirect government stuff flowing, but direct banking investments can be frozen without any issues.

2018-02-11 03:01:24 UTC  

the only law is reeee

2018-02-11 03:01:24 UTC  

I see Dan is autistic

2018-02-11 03:01:32 UTC  

I'm autistic and I'm TRIGGERED XD

2018-02-11 03:01:36 UTC  

"Winter is coming"

2018-02-11 03:01:48 UTC  

Bankers.

2018-02-11 03:02:15 UTC  

Why do you think things have been orchestrated this way?

2018-02-11 03:02:16 UTC  

You just gotta hit 'em.

2018-02-11 03:02:18 UTC  

<@237954551062200322> = sub human REEE

2018-02-11 03:02:45 UTC  

The only reason banks were untouchable was because messing with them would cause an economical collapse.

2018-02-11 03:02:46 UTC  

true but with the current state of involvement by the majority of banks it would still causae harm to alot of people

2018-02-11 03:02:47 UTC  

@Deleted User HES GOT THE MEMES

2018-02-11 03:03:00 UTC  

Name one group of people it would harm.

2018-02-11 03:03:13 UTC  

probly israel

2018-02-11 03:03:28 UTC  

@walmart greeter meh fuck those guys

2018-02-11 03:03:28 UTC  

Only the guilty parties would be negatively impacted at this point.

2018-02-11 03:03:34 UTC  

they aren't america

2018-02-11 03:03:35 UTC  

So...let the freezing begin.

2018-02-11 03:03:38 UTC  

the people working in low paying jobs within the gouvernment whos jobs would be cut

2018-02-11 03:03:47 UTC  

@Deleted User i agreee

2018-02-11 03:03:57 UTC  

The taxpayers are all that's needed to fund those jobs.

2018-02-11 03:04:10 UTC  

Cutting the banks out by freezing everything wouldn't harm anyone.

2018-02-11 03:04:21 UTC  

Only the corrupt.

2018-02-11 03:04:40 UTC  

Those who would not like it are guilty by association.

2018-02-11 03:04:44 UTC  

but still the input of money coming in to china. if it was to stay the same they would have to raise taxse and thats a whole nother matter

2018-02-11 03:04:47 UTC  

That's the beauty of it.

2018-02-11 03:05:06 UTC  

No they wouldn't, the banks wouldn't be leeching off of governments.

2018-02-11 03:05:12 UTC  

That means less taxes.

2018-02-11 03:05:46 UTC  

but still that would not halt these banks in their path noone is stupid enough to invest all ther money into one pale

2018-02-11 03:06:00 UTC  

This entire thing was set up with one goal in mind.

2018-02-11 03:06:26 UTC  

To be able to freeze all banks' assets without a negative economical impact.