y'all got any third 🅱️ositionism fellas

@fannybandit remember in my system there is no banks and there is protectionalism and capitalism

All created and managed by banks.

@Deleted User
Post-Left is the way.
There was never any good Communism, only the ideal which couldn't grow due to the States.

Where government failed, banks succeeded.

In 1913, banks ensured that the American government would fail.

That's how the banks gained power.

they did

it was terrorism

Yes it was.

Governments are the banks.
Banks are just satalite states.

so how can one be a socialist with out being in a organization

No, banks conrol entire nations.

That's why there's only a few stable currencies, but many nations.

Redpill me on post-left positions. I only know of egoism, and thats fucking garbage.

Without banking, every nation's currency would be worth more.

Nothing would be fiat.

If something became fiat, that nation would fail in front of the world.

Everyone would then be replaced.

That's a free market.

replaced by gun

A nation's market would then be free and have more value due to it's potential.

Every nation would strive to have a stronger currency.

A nation's success would all be the value of it's currency.

@♡♡♡
Egoism is misunderstood, since people don't read it correctly, they fail to read into it, and then they go on about spooks & non-sense.
Most post-left postions though relate to considering the future.
Mainly, Nick Land if you boil off the excess and get at the core point he makes about our future with technologey.

This is all without banks.

We would be motivated to uphold potential.

so what kind of currency should there be

are you calling me post left or are you giving me an example

Nationalism would then be profitable...not warmonging.

Well I'm a reactionary luddite fuck and I hate technology

so there's that

@Deleted User
Oh, I was saying join the post-left.

@白先生 Every nation would have their own currency over a short period of time.

More money would move.

food stamps

?

Greater circulation in the bankless market would be free-flowing.

i didn't quite believe that such a thing exists. people actually arguing about this. what a stupid argument. ofc, the banks are cancer, and religion and politics and scientology and all politics residing on a spectrum that gives people a choice. the sustainable way to assume a legacy of greed is to give people no choice. you want to argue that left or right is right in any way? the argument is consumed in flames of hate and division. stop thinking so laterally. the way forward is a complete automatic government system that eliminates any human decision or greed or corruption. we all live equal. communism with an automatic governing system is the system of the future. left is as useless as right and mid of either side is just a way of avoid an argument without making any ground.

No one is arguing, calm your man-tits.

more money fixes everything