What is your definition of civilization then?

A world-wide understanding in which poverty does not exist.

Does that not only exist in theory?

It will exist in reality with the removal of all federal government.

Who becomes in charge of the distribution of materials in this reality? or is there?

There wouldn't be anyone in charge, that's the point.

Every single time someone or something is in charge, everything goes to shit.

No person can appropriately handle power over the majority.

Therefore, we all banish the concept of ruling.

Corruption creates a ruling class, a ruling class creates corruption.

You can think that, but over time among all groups of people there are personalities who rise up to lead and the rest follow, that's humanity.

Removing rule completely will eliminate poverty.

That's actually my entire point.

There isn't a single true leader in every single government globally.

Abolishing all government immediately will allow true leaders to replace rulers.

But the true leaders, do they have the people in mind or will the power corrupt them eventually as well?

Society is governed, civilization is led.

Only the true leaders, tested and true, will ever get a chance to have power.

That's infinitely better than the knowingly corrupted and wealthy ruling over the impoverished.

The class that actually works has the best leaders in the world.

Among the ruling class, there isn't a single leader...only rulers.

Ironically...the rulers are oppressing the leaders.

We started as a civilization and society was born from it with the corrupt leaders rising to power, will the process keep repeating as society rises again and new people come to the same conclusion?

Current government is an intentional insanity.

Removing that insanity will at least allow the people of the world to have a chance at a decent life.

If we break the cycle of intentional and orchestrated insanity, right now, it's probable that society will never exist again.

Especially once civilization is successful.

Once poverty become a thing of the past, just like mass warfare, then society will seem like the medieval ages.

That's evolution.

I honestly think we can never reach that level, humanity is repeating the same problems so it becomes a cycle we can only study and theorize.

We've already studied this and the conclusion is obvious...government and the societies they bring create an intentional insanity that fails the majority willfully.

Therefore, the only reasonable way to evolve is to remove government entirely.

We must continue to evolve, or we will continue to fail.

There is no other way to evolve.

For the people to rise, government must fall.

If the people are to rise, education will need to be more widespread and with technology this seems to be more of a reality. But I am still stuck at the thought that people at least some will succumb to corruption and people will rise again but there will always be people who suffer at such corruption which will continue to happen.

In a civilization, no government, those who rise will do by the consent of the majority in a natural and open market.

They will not be wealthy people who are pre-positioned, filtered, hand selected, and then put on stage for a puppet show.

They will naturally stand-out among their peers by having conviction, honor, and discipline.

More poor people have the traits of leadership than wealthy people.

Leadership is the potential of humanity.