Message from @Stryker
Discord ID: 492803511210475522
any murder should be considered a mass shooting then
mass shooting = massacre
its not a massacre if its two people shooting eachother
thats just a gun fight
im not trying to say those arent bad
but its like calling any mechanical failure on a plane a crash
>it doesnt matter
it does, because what I'm trying to say is it's not a proper analogy
well do you atleast understand my point or are you just going to keep arguing over definitions when its pretty clear those are two seperate things
but tbh I'm kind of glad
jamal and tyrone shooting eachother over crack =/= sperg mcautist shooting up his school and killing a bunch of people with no proper means to defend themselves
What I'm saying is that 4 deaths is a fucking lot
panda's and mine efforts paid off
it is but if theres a fight over it its dumb to compare it to some kids getting killed
stryker went from being a dumb progun trumpist to a pathetic defensive position
what happened stryker you were so certain once
now you're only like >oh yeah ekshuli guns are bad but we cant do anything :/
also the other element of this argument is that if those shoot outs are even preventable, same thing for most homicides which are gang related. America has a lot of crime period regardless of guns, so its arguable if any gun regulation would even have a major impact on crime related stuff because most criminals use illegally aquired guns
what
im not saying guns are bad
im saying even if you wanted to you couldnt get rid of them
>oh yeh climeat change isnt really a chinese hoax but uhhh weeellll
i dont want them gone, infact i think we need more
fuck I reverted 2 years of our efforts
shouldn't have said that
but the best argument is to just show how your opponents argument is shitty and flawed
> most criminals use illegally aquired guns
well then banning them would make the access to those guns more difficult (and thus make the illegal ones more expensive)
>we need more guns
well then banning them would make the access to those guns more difficult (and thus make the illegal ones more expensive)
no it wouldnt
because there are already hundreds of millions of guns, its an uncontrollable black market like i said
dude this is the US
they have no such thing as government
not to mention we border latin america my dude
no proper law enforcement
its a wild west
if they banned guns i would just get one of pedro
off
in kangarooland it did. So much that barely anyone can afford them because they cost a fortune
they only have a government to wage wars and subsidy their corpojews
```in kangarooland it did. So much that barely anyone can afford them because they cost a fortune(edited)
``` The aussies gave them in voluntarily, which will never happen in the US for 1. Also they don't have the cartels right on their border