Message from @funiek
Discord ID: 544128981348253697
but its good for what it is
whats "good" about the story? its purely archetypical
this
@rogalik you didn't like the original trilogy? I like it more because of muh Vader and because actors there are actually not bad. The "new" trilogy has too many cringe scenes and dialogues.
it is purely archetypical, its a classic story it doesnt pretend to be anything else
<:haha:318675605233336330>
priest breakfast
are these things even good?
they have basically no taste
oh, so they must be good with the wine and the monster 🤔
it must taste like an cereal, idk
they're flavourless and based
@funiek guess what they contain
wheat
flesh of christ
technically yes
but im looking for a specific thing
ahem
indeed
its baked priest cum
they just add a bit on flour
no that shit is gay
it replaced bread
literally why
@Mastisæg well the new one has crap acting thats true at least besides ewan mcgregor but muh visual also padme > leia also the best lightsaber fight
@rogalik Padme > Leia? Are you serious? What makes her better? Personally I dislike both the character and the actress, this jewess just doesn't fit the "noble" role.
Also all the scenes with Anakin-Padme relationships were cringy for me and still are such. I don't know how to explain why it is so, but their dialogues just seem bad written to me.
the jewess doesnt fit the noble role? she look like a princess and why padme > leia? because she looks better <:haha:318675605233336330>
they were poorly written
Come on, she doesn't.
It's matter of taste maybe, but really doesn't look better. For me at least.
leia has a dog face
Padme has dirty face lol.
Literally. It's like she was under the sun in the sands too much.
I just don't like Portman, she's not attractive at all
But lightsaber fights and visuals yes
Worthy
oh god portman is not attractive