People would still work if they weren't forced to.

The difference is, corporations wouldn't profit as much.

Yeah the state would

The difference between freedom and slavery is wanting to work rather than needing to.

Someone has to work

You need food shelter

It doesn't come for free

You can have all of those things without working a full time job...in an open market absent slavery.

this isn't even good trolling

Please troll better queef

Imagine if everyone received a base income to cover all costs of living.

Why

After that, you work for personal profits...not survival.

Who's gonna pay for it

Government and the wealthy.

LOL

lets do a simple problem

That's called "giving back".

scale it down a little

lets say hypothetically

jobs were becoming harder to find

Whose responsible for that?

and a lot not even needed

What if the gov had a job garauntee and had people do productive things instead

Instead of getting money for existing

Government isn't accountable or competent enough to trust on that level.

Do you force ppl to do bs jobs that dont produce anything

When government guarantees something, it's statistically fucked.

Just like how they're supposed to guarantee life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

They've been failing willfully for over 100 years.

Government gets money for just existing.

A job garauntee would give the workers more leverage in the private sector since they could always quit and work for the state

Why shouldn't the people...the supreme state?

The last thing that we need is bigger government and more taxes.

The gov gets money to protect your rights

What rights have they protected?

Name one.

Queef do you think things are running well

Life liberty pursuit of happiness

the whole thing is on the verge of collapse

Yeah unemployment all time low, GDP is high