it pretty much stems back to the paris commune

they are just two different ways of implementing an idea

Anarchism strongly rejects vanguardism for example

as it is inherently authoritarian

I do know that goals are pretty much same, but way to achieve those goals are radically different to each ideology.

sure

Marxism isn't inherently authoritarian

but Tankies love that shit

I was a trotskyist before

I still don't get diffrences betwen stalin trot 😐

posadism <:blobsmirk:396521731185180684>

pretty much trotskyism is a reaction to stalins bureaucracy

this is a gross simplification

in my humble opinion, trotsky was just butthurt on stalin winning party struggle 😛

yup

I honestly do not believe it would be any different if would trotsky win in party struggle

then we would have stalin writing crique of trotsky

😄

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NCwELFHAd5Y

and being emigree

lol

probably not

sorry I mean

thats probably true

lenin was a bit of shit as well

and trotsky certainly worked with him

well, they were all product of the those times, and harldy anyone can be different

for sure

I mean, being all secrative due tsarist regime, oganising in tight circles etc.

burn your heroes honestly

or at least don't worship them

like if they die don't preserve their body in a glass coffin for everyone to see just so you can maintain a cult of personality around him

😄

Idolatry is a cancer

Yes because when I say help my fellow human beings what I'm really saying is build a giant fucking statue of me and worship me

but, tbh their way of running things worked (vanguard party) - they successfully have rid of tsar, nationalised economy and tried socialism to be implemented.

Life of Brian is Jesus' biography

I mean, experiment of social-democracy (old) has failed and it did not gave results (many of them have become liberal parties) as well euro-commies

pretty much

and Muhammeds

look at the UK labor party under Blair