Also, Hitler didn't eat a bullet because he was a pussy that was bullied into submission by Stalin. He actually fled to South America.

but it didnt happen because a: hitler did not want 'muh 6 million gematria magical number' jews to be killed for no reason at all because he hated them (thats why there were jews in the german reich right)

b: every stance that is held up by american view of the holocaust is just absolute bullshit like it was almost produced in hollywood (oh wait)

and c: because given from each perspective of the time that precedes the moment of the end of the war and the effort during it makes absolutely no sense as why there would be motivation to do it

also d: there are jewish religious stupidities for everything involved

like for example

many jewish newspapers predicting the holocaust 100 years before it happened

Literally every single one of your supposed points is complete and utter bullshit that can easily be disproven by empirical research.

What's really sad is the fact that you're only slightly less intelligent than the average fascist 'intellectual'.

Keep projecting your insecurities and blaming da jooz.

you just made the same mistake again

but feel free to give me this "empirical research"

i'm willing to bet money u cant prove to me that hitler wanted a systematic murder of '6 million da juus'

on that same note prove to me that there is anything inherently wrong with nationalism

Hello

I can prove to you that Hitler and his cronies desired the systematic extermination of ethnic groups deemed "inferior". That's just common knowledge though tbh. And 'nationalism' is a thing of the past. We live under a globalised system of socioeconomic relations, in a technologically interconnected world.

Nation states are old news.

i dont see how u can associate yourself with being an intellectual by saying the term 'common knowledge'

external relations of countries and states have nothing to do with nationalism

I never actually claimed to be an intellectual, nor was it implied. I also fail to see how universally accepted facts are somehow anti-intellectual.

proposing that in an argument is completely arbitrary

you can only argue something that is from a sourced fact

not just 'common knowledge'

that is far too ambiguous

That wasn't actually the crux of my argument, I added that in order to express my astoundment with your lack of knowledge that even a grade-schooler possesses.

thats just an opinion not objectively what he or anyone else in the reich regime would have wanted

t. was a grade schooler, indoctrinated with the same bullshit, found out it was bulslhit later

Hitler himself made his distaste for certain ethnic groups known in his writings as well as his speeches.

define 'distaste'

Disgusted by the presence of a certain ethnic group

you know if you read the talmud i think you would concur

Talking like they are the black plague "parasite"

its also not the ethnic group mind you

know the distinction between the person and the religion they affiliate with

Which parts of the Talmud? The ones that were clearly forgeries created by anti-semitic and generally xenophobic Christians?

thats why rabbis will tell you that it is valid and that it must be 'identified in the context'

but its a forgery>

I didn't know you could make forgeries of ancient oral traditions taught from rabbi to rabbi

Thanks for letting me know

I guess all transcriptions ever are fake