Blame da joos.

No, Vatican is above CIA.

Actually, the Vatican is the international CIA.

Intelligence, counter-intelligence, money laundering, influence peddling, warmonging, etc.

If the international CIA isn't stable...then I ask again...

Who's in charge?

It's not any public figure whatsoever.

must be those darned jews

If they were in charge, they would've claimed some form of responsibility for the world changing for the better.

Such as ISIS being defeated...not even Trump claimed responsibility for that.

It makes you think, doesn't it?

have they been defeated though

Yes.

They are no longer a military/militant group.

Now ISIS is just another dangerous idea without casualties.

Just like religion...without the crusades.

How can anyone explain all of that along with the fact that not a single person took credit for any of it?

Well...except me of course...

Military intelligence is watching this.

They must be laughing.

And you guys called me the conspiracy theorist.....

It's not a conspiracy.

No more ISIS and no one took credit.

@fannybandit Bullshit.

Which part?

Russia, iraq, and syria have.

Show me.

Keep in mind, the US trained Iraqi forces and US forces had the most sway in the Middle East.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/putin-makes-first-visit-to-syria-lauds-victory-over-isis-and-announces-withdrawals/2017/12/11/f75389de-de61-11e7-8679-a9728984779c_story.html?utm_term=.6939279f56dd

Of course it's a victory.

Did he claim responsibility though?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.nytimes.com/2017/12/09/world/middleeast/iraq-isis-haider-al-abadi.amp.html

It also doesn't explain the US's side of things...who had majority control in the region.

Yes...both declared victory.

Yet...no one claimed responsibility.

Putin couldn't have done it, Russia didn't have full control.

Neither did Iraq/US.

They would've had to work together...when they were considered enemies at the time.

No explanation.

They just magically became friends and killed ISIS?

The fuck?