Message from @fannybandit

Discord ID: 418609902089535499


2018-03-01 03:18:38 UTC  

Therefore, anyone can reasonably deduce that terrorism on a conventional warfighting level no longer exists.

2018-03-01 03:18:39 UTC  

FUCK.

2018-03-01 03:19:23 UTC  

"liveuamap"

2018-03-01 03:19:31 UTC  

"Totally legit bro"

2018-03-01 03:19:39 UTC  

The UN has one of those...

2018-03-01 03:20:08 UTC  

Also, airstrikes are not conventional warfighting.

2018-03-01 03:20:12 UTC  

@fannybandit A fallacy I see, you ignore the evidence and just claim "B-BUT IT IS JUST PROPAGANDA!".

2018-03-01 03:20:17 UTC  

They're called in by special operations.

2018-03-01 03:21:00 UTC  

I'm not saying that it's propaganda, I'm saying that it doesn't constitute conventional warfighting whatsoever.

2018-03-01 03:21:31 UTC  

I wouldn't go around using that as a credible source, even if it is, it only proves my point.

2018-03-01 03:21:39 UTC  

Conventional warfare is dead.

2018-03-01 03:22:33 UTC  

Four soldiers...all with no names...

2018-03-01 03:23:18 UTC  

And yes, airstrikes are a conventional form of warfare, it has been for 100 years now.

Why would a terrorist cell purposefully give out the names of their soldiers in a guriella resistance movement?

2018-03-01 03:23:29 UTC  

Also...if this was true...how would this be conventional?

2018-03-01 03:23:46 UTC  

It's not conventional when special operations calls it in.

2018-03-01 03:25:51 UTC  

You know,we won't come to you.
You have to come to us.

2018-03-01 03:25:57 UTC  

@fannybandit It is conventional, because it has been used in conventional warfare for over 100 years, with battles being assited by planes.

Who is special operations? Last I knew, al-shabab was an entrance of ISIS into somalia, which cannot realistically be stopped, because there has been no government in somalia for several decades.

2018-03-01 03:26:18 UTC  

@Krokodilanto Who are you and who are you talking to?

2018-03-01 03:26:35 UTC  

@Deleted User I'm talking about how it's used...not what it is.

2018-03-01 03:26:47 UTC  

I'm speaking to whoever's listening

2018-03-01 03:26:50 UTC  

That determines whether it's conventional or not.

2018-03-01 03:27:04 UTC  

@Krokodilanto Why would anyone come to you?

2018-03-01 03:27:10 UTC  

Not me

2018-03-01 03:27:11 UTC  

Us

2018-03-01 03:27:23 UTC  

Who's "us"?

2018-03-01 03:28:00 UTC  

@fannybandit Planes that drop bombs on people, or get into dogfights with other planes, what is non conventional about it? Does it has to be a rugged soldier with a gun in hand to be conventional for you?

2018-03-01 03:28:22 UTC  

We're talking about airstrikes being called in by special operations...not dog-fighting.

2018-03-01 03:28:28 UTC  

Context is everything.

2018-03-01 03:28:57 UTC  

@Krokodilanto You're being creepy...which explains why this person in question isn't coming to you.

2018-03-01 03:30:16 UTC  

@Krokodilanto How would someone come to you?

2018-03-01 03:31:00 UTC  

@fannybandit Hold it there pal, don't play your mental gymnastics with me, you have claimed that these have been nonconventional for an extremely long time now, as well as that, a US soldier in the US who calls in an airstrike is not at all unconventional, they are not DELTA force or a CIA cell, they are regular soldiers, same goes for syria, turkey, and iraq.

2018-03-01 03:31:10 UTC  

@Krokodilanto Tell your people to send someone who's more competent.

2018-03-01 03:31:46 UTC  

I'm merely talking about SOCOM and MARSOC.

2018-03-01 03:32:17 UTC  

Then you are pulling a massive strawman on magnitudes that can only be mirrored to an autistic child.

2018-03-01 03:32:31 UTC  

If you're part of a special operations group, what you do is not conventional.

2018-03-01 03:32:39 UTC  

It's that simple.

2018-03-01 03:33:10 UTC  

If they don't know how to come to us we aren't interested in receiving them

2018-03-01 03:33:22 UTC  

@fannybandit Not exactly, special operations groups can assist in wars, preform regular operations.