They both want islamic jihad, and they both want islamic republics, albiet in different parts of the world, ISIS wants to be present in the middle east and eygpt, while boko haram is in west africa, as well as that, there is also the ISIS cells in somalia, which there is no real way of stopping, because somalia has no government.

Did israel ever declare alliegiance to the US and get annexed by them? No, that's what boko haram did.

No, the US declares allegiance to Israel.

Read what I type please.

Boko Haram is not an ISIS cell, just an ally.

This is basically like WW2, Japan with no Germany.

It's only a matter of time.

Terrorism is losing massively.

No, they are binded by an alliance to israel.

Nope, if they declared alligence to ISIS, and were annexed by them, then they are ISIS, just in west africa.

Swearing allegiance makes them an ally.

If they were ISIS, they would've been crushed already.

They have different leadership.

You're not entirely wrong, they are like ISIS.

They are just completely different entities.

Their likeness is what made them allies.

No, it means they make themselves a satellite, and do you really expect an anarchic african country do be able to do anything against ISIS in west africa?

No, that's why AFRICOM was in place.

We have special operations cleaning them up daily.

We just have to get more serious about it...just like we did with ISIS.

Wow, they really did a good job at cleaning them out, they are still present and thriving in africa.

We were busy with ISIS.

Now we can shift our full attention to Africa.

Nobody cares about africa, and all the aid we send them get's wasted, it is clear that boko haram and al shabab is not going anywhere anytime soon.

With geospatial systems, drones, special operations groups, and intelligence on leadership...we can clean Africa up in under 2 weeks.

It is physically possible, but realistically? Not at all.

People said the same thing about ISIS.

You sound like trump who said that he would defeat ISIS in under 100 days.

Trump had nothing to do with any of that.

He's not competent enough to command the destruction of ISIS.

You see, ISIS is still prevalent in the middle east, and they are currently carrying out guriella operations in iraq after conventional warfare failed.

If that was true, we would have conventional casualties.

What the fuck did you just say?

We only have special operations casualties.

Green Berets.

Did you say that guriella warfare gives you conventional casualties?

Are you literally autistic?

How in the fuck could ISIS conduct guerilla warfare when they've been defeated?

I read what you said wrong, I read that they were conducting conventional warfare.

They've never been conventional.

They haven't been defeated though, they still have supporters, territory, and steady supply from israel and turkey.

I'm Trent Johnson And i will be your DJ For tonight