Message from @Nike
Discord ID: 422127475418464257
But i only need to provide a counterexample to your argument
No, it isnt
If the wealthy, who are the problem, are getting more out of it than the people...that means it did not solely or directly benefit the people.
You can have tax credirs for low income without those for the wealthy, but politicians are bought by the wealthy
No shit.
That's my overall point.
Governments make many decisions, some can help the rich, some can help the poor, some help both, some screw both
Government is nothing more than an extension of the oppressing wealthy/ruling class.
And its not all one movement
This is exactly why a revolution is absolutely necessary.
By voting for the right people, you can at least steer it in a better direction
Corruption is strangling the people.
Vote for which wealthy person exactly?
You're making many different points at once, most of which i already agree with
I just dont like the view that government cant be used to help poor people
Then why are you posturing as if there's a debate?
Since it already does
Thats the point i disagree with
Ok, so then you agree.
That's it.
What do you disagree with?
Nothing.
That's what I thought.
I think ur trolling now, i made it very obvious
Nice context editing there CNN.
What do you disagree with?
Government helps the poor sometimes.
How so?
We're going in circles...
Are we going back to the tax credits again?
Take for example universal healthcare in canada
That helps the poor by socializing the cost
Of healthcare
That also benefits the wealthy.
Ok, but that doesnt contradict my point
The point is it helps the poor
I never said it did.
Okay
I'm claiming that government hasn't done a single thing to solely and/or directly help the people.