Message from @Suleiman
Discord ID: 427933685136752656
Again, your opinion.
Which is inferior to a nation's rule of law.
fuckface
If you think law is above human opinion than how did those laws get there
then*
Morality and history.
They create ethics.
thats queer slang for someones opinion
No, that's considered lessons learned...something you fail to appreciate.
We became America through the right to keep and bear arms...the militia/minutemen.
yes lessons learned 300 years ago
They still apply today.
no you became American then you made the changes
they're called Amendments for a reason
Without the 2nd amendment, nothing could stop government from becoming absolutely tyrannical.
they werent in the original draft
That's the people's insurance policy against tyranny.
It's in the constitution, that's all that matters.
you know what, Prohibition was in the constitution - should we bring that back?
because it was law
must mean its good
Wrong, it was a violation of the 4th amendment and enacting it in itself was unlawful.
No law can violate a person's rights...otherwise it is null and void.
it was enacted through legal means
it became nullified.
It was unlawful.
That was a lesson learned.
If you violate rights, the people suffer.
It never happened again.
Judicial precedence is of little regard as society evolves
Society evolves because of precedence.
you cant have 300 years of precedence and then think your nation will be the exact same
precedence is the legitimate status quo
of law
Evolution is stabilized by precedence.
wait
Without precedence, you have anarchy.
so you said it evolves because of it
but it also stabilizes evolution
so