Message from @Suleiman
Discord ID: 427937354477469698
ur mom gay
@fannybandit How does that mean they supported it?
Stay mad.
If they created the context in which slavery would be abolished, that would mean that they did not want slavery.
Therefore, the founding fathers supported the abolition of slavery.
@fannybandit Lmao what?
I can't simplify that any more.
@fannybandit Creating the context for something to happen doesn't mean you supported whatever happened next
@fannybandit That isn't valid as evidence
They literally created the entire foundation for slavery to become abolished.
What more can a group of people do?
Outright abolishing it would've collapsed the entire nation.
@fannybandit Support abolishing slavery?
You do realize that you're still trying to poke holes in the supreme law of the land...right?
I wouldn't want you to lose track of your own objective here...
Fanny
you seem to hold law in such high regard
I do.
Some people, look at Law critically, and like the question its legitimacy.
It's the most equalizing force on the planet.
intelligent people
:f
If only those intelligent people could realize that without the law, you would have complete chaos...
Pity.
@fannybandit No one is saying there should be no laws
No, you're questioning the supreme law of the land based on the status of those who founded it.
Which is pathetic.
questioning law is how society evolves
otherwise
USA would still allow slavery
He never questioned the law.
and being homosexual would still be a crime
He questioned the constitutions legitimacy based on the founders' status.
Where in the constitution is homosexuality addressed?
Now you're literally making shit up.
You should stop shilling for the anti-law elites.
That's cute.
You should meme more like an intellectual.
I'm so sorry that the writ of law is so inconvenient to you...