No, you're questioning the supreme law of the land based on the status of those who founded it.

Which is pathetic.

questioning law is how society evolves

otherwise

USA would still allow slavery

He never questioned the law.

and being homosexual would still be a crime

He questioned the constitutions legitimacy based on the founders' status.

Where in the constitution is homosexuality addressed?

Now you're literally making shit up.

You should stop shilling for the anti-law elites.

@fannybandit

That's cute.

You should meme more like an intellectual.

I'm so sorry that the writ of law is so inconvenient to you...

Try moving to a different country.

Do you support this?

No.

I support what the founding fathers created, not their individual ideologies.

Teamwork makes the dream work.

@fannybandit You realize the people who wrote the constitution made an amendment to change it for a reason

Which amendment?

I recall an amendment that allows you to add amendments beyond the bill of rights...not to alter the constitution.

It seems you willfully misunderstand the simplicities of the writ of law.

The elite would be proud of you...if you didn't fail so miserably.

@fannybandit https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Five_of_the_United_States_Constitution

Again, that allows for amendments to be added...not for the constitution to be changed.

Huge difference.

@fannybandit It's been changed with 27 amendments on 18 separate occasions, as recently as May 7th, 1992.

It's been added to 27 times...not changed.

You willfully misunderstand the simple difference.

It's like talking to a politician...

@fannybandit yes you can the 11th Amendment, 12th amendment, 13th amendment, 17th amendment, and 20th amendment, all of which directly altered or replaced portions of the original text of the Constitution.

None of those amendments altered the original text of the Constitution.

Doing so is impossible.

You cannot alter the one thing all law refers to in order to continue upholding law.

That would mean that the constitution would not be the supreme law of the land.

None of those amendments altered or replaced any text of the constitution.

If anything, they've simplified the articles.

Let me know once you're done intentionally misunderstanding how the law works like every other shill.