stateless

autism

woah criminals governing themselves

I wouldn't capture it. Because NOBODY could handle that much power without issues.

except not legally criminals amazing

So youd argue that having no authority doesnt automatically conclude in people being able to do whatever they want?

Since there is no authority to tell then what they can and can not do

You will have to give yourself omega self cuck

People can defend themselves. Thats the point

So it would be legal to kill or rape but your argument is that that would be balanced by militia or own right

and the only rule is, you cannot restrict others' freedom.

Thats libertarianism

And without a state you have nobody to enforce it

Libertarianism still believes that a state is necessary.

Anarchism does not

comparing those two is dumb

Well its basically the same except that libertarians awknoledge the inability of people to govern themselves without an enforcer of basic rughts

So no comparing them isnt dumb

Comparing christianity and nihilism would be db

Dumb

no. Libertarians believe in free market capitalism. Anarchists want to destroy the upper class.

We call this philosophy; "class war"

See thats where you slip again, libertarianism is not an economical ideology

It is.

No it is not

Prove.

Its projectable on economic situations, its not inherently about it

The premise of libertarianism is that the individual freedom is the most important

Free market is part of that

Not the other way around

Yeah thats why switzerland identifies as a "libertarian" country, and has absolute free market. Thats also why Denmark identified as a "libertarian" country at some point after the victory of a rightist party. Oh and not to mention "liberland"

Yeah there is not an argument in there

But I like how you have been able to not use caps for a while

Well done

Pure libertarianism is about free market. They may care about their rights more but thats the nature of a simple human being, and they still want free market so

But for example

No you are plainly wrong

libsoc, isn't about it.

And your argument about switzerland, tgat doesnt identify aa libertarian at all, doesnt prove anything

It only enforces my statement

Im out