good one

@yung Not an argument.

“i’m not mad, i’m not mad”

not an argument @Deleted User

@yung

actually that’s not an argument

arguments aren’t inherently arguments

we went over this!

@yung

@yung

is something elaborate, when it is elaborate?

🤔🤔

@yung And once again, because you run out of stuff to argue with, you resort to baiting and trolling....

there is no argument to be had anymore dude. You made one argument, which is sending me sources that contradicted your own opinion

I’m sorry that you’re this stubborn

@yung Check the PM's again.

Must be hard to ignore facts to protect your feels

let me check...

is this it? LMAO

I found your argument dude

now I understand

enlightening

@yung Check my clarification.

As in my post right after.

And yes I’m petty

@yung More like incredibly stubborn and petty.

at least not petty bourgeois

^^^

true edge lives in me

You cannot even accept the idea that free markets might not be inherently capitalist, so you throw a massive fit as a result.

“fit”

I’m making fun of your cognitive dissonance . it’s you who is going on on how a nation that had a capitalist mode of production, is a third position

@yung My point proven.

what point?

did I prove just now

That you are incredibly stubborn and dismissive.

I’m stubborn

but not dismissive

I just don’t accept circular reasoning.
>Nazism is a third position and not capitalism because profit wasn’t produced for profit’s sake
>Gets asked to show any shred of evidence for this
>Sources links that say that Nazi Germany had markets which were not autonomous because of a state of war and that markets and thus profits would have autonomised after the war, directly proving the opposite
>Gets called out on this
>”It’s not in aligned with Nazi rhetoric”