Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 441432891977891860
Yes
In a socialist economy with money are only certain things free?
you can be passionate about medicine and be a doctor to objectively improve human health, lifespan etc.
or u can do it for money...
@Deleted User Yes real innovation comes from publicly funded programs
real innovation comes from people that are motivated enough to do something regardless of money, who do it out of passion and obectiveness
Agreed
In a Socialist Society with no money what things are free to obtain?
profit motivation just muddies the water with people that just do it for money
How does it work then? No one wants to do anything for free and as such you obviously can’t just scrap monetary value and capitalism
@Aidan xD Whatever they can agree upon
its just like fighting, some do it for money but the best do it for legacy, passion , lust to be the best
not something you filth would know about@ManaBunzz#5246
scum
what lmao ?
monkey pea brains havent evolved yet, still want shiny
I asked a genuine question
And your answer was an insult
doesn’t really equate to an informed conversation
monetary value is unnecessary middle man
okay but then how do you propose things such as obtaining/purchasing land ?
these are genuine questions I want to know, I’m not trying to cause shit
if a collective wants to start a project to build a space station and they can get the resources needed why should they pay for them? coz someone claim it was theirs? and they have to "pay" him?
see what i mean
unneeded middle man
so why would the person who has the resources give them up for no gain if they're not interested in helping build said space station?
all this price stuff, only serves for people that dont want to work and be objective and think they can force others to do something they dont want to do
right i mean if they built the equipment needed to harvest and process resources, and they found a where they are all they have to do is harvest them
then why should they be slowed down?
coz someon is gonna claim some hole in the ground?
and say they have to pay him?
what gives nestle the right to claim the lakes they claim now?
they claim they OWN the great lakes
money slows down advancement
middle man
yeah but what im saying is that only works if the land is not already owned. If you have it owned and someone wants to have it you wouldn't give it up for nothing wether that be money or trading resources.
this ofcourse in a nation where this system is recognized
ahhh
obviously you wouldnt go into a cpaitalist country and do that