well, i think you're incorrect in that assumption

*everyone else is wrong*

i think the wealth of information available points in the direction that the holocaust did indeed happen and that there's not much evidence that it didn't

@When Things Aren't Right Go Left The thing is that you don't really know, but because the common consensus is that it did/didn't happen and dosen't conflict with your belief, you believe that it is above questioning, and anybody who does question it is automatically wrong.

@mcstubbs You got any to show me?

@When Things Aren't Right Go Left When did I claim everybody else was wrong?

ya'll read mark fisher

@🖤 Limeboo 🖤 Sounds like a faggot.

https://www.fold3.com/title/622/wwii-german-documents-among-war-crimes-records

don't bully he was a good lad

there's some good stuff in here

the eichmann trials are good

the nuremberg trials in general are good

p-please read mark fisher

@Deleted User you are not playing by the rules of historical evidence or even logic

Why would anyone bother?

@mcstubbs

huh, didn't show that on desktop

sorry about that

@When Things Aren't Right Go Left I don't give a damn, I am not required to follow your rules to please you.

@Deleted User So you're not interested in a debate?

@mcstubbs Any evidence that dosen't have me sign up for a fishy website?

@When Things Aren't Right Go Left Funny coming from the guy who claimed that the holocaust is above questioning.

@Deleted User Because there's no evidence to even start a debate

@When Things Aren't Right Go Left I don't see any from you

i mean, transcriptions of the eichmann trials, the eichmann interrogations and the nuremberg trials are widely available

*Google searching intensifes*

@mcstubbs Yhea, it isn't like they were coercied or threatened into confessing or anything.

i mean, from what i can gather, a lot of them weren't

@mcstubbs How would you know?

all of them weren't, from what i can tell

How would you know?

well, i remember reading a while back (i'll have to dig it up) that the american and british investigators didn't for one quite simple reason

they needed the trials to be legitimate

the needed to set a precedent for war crimes trials because nothing like it had really been pulled off before

@mcstubbs And how do you know they didn't do it behind the scenes and off the record?

(What a citation that is, by the way.)

if we couldn't hide a couple of guys breaking into the watergate hotel, how would we manage to pull that off

i think at some point, occam's razor has to come into play here

there's either a massive judeo-bolshevist conspiracy that's infiltrated the ranks of every major power on the fact of the earth and interrogated former nazis and fabricated a holocaust and nobody found out, and these jewish communists were also vehemently opposed to the USSR...