An individualist then?

I hate that word

But uh sure

Why's that?

Though i dint agree with what individualists stand for

What? Free thinking?

Its complicated

>favoring freedom of action

That would include degeneracy

That's being purely neutral. That I dont agree with at all.

Yea I don’t agree with much either

Im no libtard or cuckservative

No commi no nazi

No fashist no individual

Just a millenial who hates labels? Lul

Im not a millenial neither actually

I kid, I guess Im the same. Except I have some basic labels. Like pacifist and free thinker.

I just dont like subscribing to a set of ideas

Independent thinking basically.

Nor do I.

I wouldnt say Im exactly one who is a pure pacifist since Im clearly aware that there will always be stuff like war. However I wouldn't fight in one personally. I'd support some sides though depending on the war and the sides.

Im far from that i think

Meaning?

Not that war is not important, it can most likely be avoided or substituted by something else

Oh I disagree, war is inevitable and it comes eventually.

Sure war occurs in the most diverse places

It can be avoided sometimes but it comes eventually.

Sticking with ones tribe only will most likely avoid wars

And Im talking about not just wars between nations but also civil wars.

Civil wars happens because of corruption

Killing the main enemy is a quick solution

There will always be imperialists who want to take over your tribe and make it part of their own.

Diverse or not.

Sure, thats a nice motivation

Though it can also most likely be avoided or substituted

You can threaten eachother though. Make sure you're both in limbo depending on how strong you and the enemy are.

Like the possibility of ww3.

It can be avoided but for how long?

The cold war was cold

Its human nature to be dominant though

Eventually someone will be stupid enough to create nuclear war.