Are you dumb

That's what it says dude.

What are you trying to prove

"Sumner tried to promote his own more expansive wording by circumventing the Trumbull-controlled Judiciary Committee, but failed.[19] On February 10, the Senate Judiciary Committee presented the Senate with an amendment proposal based on drafts of Ashley, Wilson and Henderson.[20][21]

The Committee's version used text from the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, which stipulates, "There shall be neither slavery nor involuntary servitude in the said territory, otherwise than in the punishment of crimes whereof the party shall have been duly convicted."[22][23]:1786 Though using Henderson's proposed amendment as the basis for its new draft, the Judiciary Committee removed language that would have allowed a constitutional amendment to be adopted with only a majority vote in each House of Congress and ratification by two-thirds of the states (instead of two-thirds and three-fourths, respectively).[24]"

I can copy paste too

Use your own words so I know what you are trying to say

dude

"The Senate passed the amendment on April 8, 1864, by a vote of 38 to 6; two Democrats, Reverdy Johnson of Maryland and James Nesmith of Oregon voted "aye." However, just over two months later on June 15, the House failed to do so, with 93 in favor and 65 against, thirteen votes short of the two-thirds vote needed for passage; the vote split largely along party lines, with Republicans supporting and Democrats opposing.[25] In the 1864 presidential race, former Free Soil Party candidate John C. Frémont threatened a third-party run opposing Lincoln, this time on a platform endorsing an anti-slavery amendment. The Republican Party platform had, as yet, failed to include a similar plank, though Lincoln endorsed the amendment in a letter accepting his nomination.[26][27] Fremont withdrew from the race on September 22, 1864 and endorsed Lincoln.[28]"

i dont know

This is very interesting.

He's talking to himself

we are walking in circles right now

Oh my...

i think ill just smoke a joint and play ck2

or something

"Republicans portrayed slavery as uncivilized and argued for abolition as a necessary step in national progress.[32] Amendment supporters also argued that the slave system had negative effects on white people. These included the lower wages resulting from competition with forced labor, as well as repression of abolitionist whites in the South. Advocates said ending slavery would restore the First Amendment and other constitutional rights violated by censorship and intimidation in slave states.[31][33]"

Alright enough side tracking now. Just thought it was interesting.

Let me have a little more of a look brb

goodnight i guess

Block him

@Larry Skywalker this is what we have to deal with

its kinda entertaining tbh

lol

yeah

Very interesting.

any syndicalists here

Hm fair point.

i like the idea behind syndicalism

i think it would work

Im surprised yet very much informed.

im more on the side of communes personaly

But yes, like I said these werent as bad as communist labor camps. They are and were bad of course and Im against both obviously.

but i wont be upset if worker´s unions organiced the means of production

That and I never really hard much of them being sent in labor camps or being slaves.

heard*

So no wonder this is new to me too.

Im surprised its not repealed but either way it still doesnt exclude how bad the USSR was.

Or how bad these camps were.

*repealing the constitution*

have fun doing that