Because there is no title to extract profit from it.

There is no necessity in it.

I'm also in favor of a type of socialism where managers do get paid very well.

You can possess mansions, cool cars, good quality of life

As long as you don't have a title to extract from other people's work

Other types of socialists like to make absolutely equal wages, but I'm in opposition to it

Good quality work must have a good quality pay

An inventor must have an income equivalent to the surplus of production from the invention.

If you made an invention that made most people life easy you have to have anything you like

As long as you don't use other people

Some call our type of socialism "elitarist" but we must indeed care of elite.

Elite is different from the class of bourgeoisie as long as it does not have a title to exploit the working class.

Elite must also be free from the need to exploit to prosper.

Elite must prosper without exploitation.

im 16

Based

<:dynoSuccess:314691591484866560> ***fuckpoorpeople69#8282 was banned***

Feminism gay for other reasons

How are the clinton a related to Israel

African fascism?

Fucking kek

figures that liberia is fascist

who wants to join vc

lmao @ them equating lumumba and garvey to hitler

If you use an extremely twisted definition of 'working' every system 'works'

i like how right wingers post anti communist propaganda on here as if it has any effect on the views of its opposition
'look mom! im trolling the libs!'

It'd be sad if they actually thought they changed people's minds

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9F9o6EajVow

lol wtf

communism has worked

not commu ism

but socialism

"You remember that socialism we tried, that I LIKED?"

"It was NATIONAL Socialism."

"How can Communism work? I, an YouTube intellectual who uses memes and image quotes to prove my point, shall explain this for you."

@Deleted User the right can't meme