I say Brownieboy

*Not* an ***argument***.

every time we have a debate you get roasted

You're clapped

are u talking to a mirror or somethin

heh

i won

Woah

this is epic

Nigga gimme a high five

excuse me

SORRY

what did you jst call me

Yeah I think I'm out guys, can't deal with retards.

Let me know when you shoot the vermin.

I'm not wacist

I swer

https://youtu.be/d_-lmtXpWQo

In meant to say "Brownieboy"

🦍 🍆 💦 🤦🏻

bitches love bbc

BBC Nues

stefan molyneux will save us from

We should discuss the problem with weebs

So

I think weebs hurt the ecosystem

How do we fix this? Simple. Weebocaust

https://youtu.be/v3wcUEVLyNk

https://youtu.be/FTt0ut9qz1o

this is my take on weebs

👏🏻

We should waterboard weebs for 12 hours a day

@ashoka

that is a logical fallacy... i knew you were 13 the moment i talked to you...

Step 1. Get rid of cat headphones and anime to deter people from being or becomeing a weeb

Step 2. find the remaining weebs and take them to concentration camps

Step 3. Gas em

Do you have a source on that?
Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.

Bro bro

I have a file for Mein Kampf if anyone wants it

mein kampf is gay