Message from @Victotum

Discord ID: 484588630845947906


2018-08-30 04:57:03 UTC  

>athiests

2018-08-30 04:57:09 UTC  

<:porky:315615014751043588> <:porky:315615014751043588>

2018-08-30 04:57:30 UTC  

once you figure out Marx's philosophy you can observe that the has this dialectical materialism

2018-08-30 04:57:46 UTC  

bcuz he was Hegel's student

2018-08-30 04:57:58 UTC  

and he though in a very opposite way

2018-08-30 04:58:03 UTC  

Lmao marx was the dumbest nigger on earth

2018-08-30 04:58:25 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308950154222895104/484587676440199179/40199343_2177317595886086_8789735504242278400_n.jpg

2018-08-30 04:58:33 UTC  

He was

2018-08-30 04:58:36 UTC  

while hegel thinks and believes in some kind of etherical and mystical purpose

2018-08-30 04:58:36 UTC  

Kangz

2018-08-30 04:58:56 UTC  

Really? I’d say it’s pretty smart to write a whole philosophy on why he and his friends should get free stuff

2018-08-30 04:59:03 UTC  

Marx, decides that materialism is the only thing that concerns humans

2018-08-30 04:59:25 UTC  

and that work, it's part of humans true nature

2018-08-30 04:59:43 UTC  

and we call it dialectical materialism because

2018-08-30 05:00:15 UTC  

just as hegel, he sees some kind of sytematical and dialectical steps to reach purity

2018-08-30 05:00:33 UTC  

but he applies it to materialism

2018-08-30 05:01:08 UTC  

therefore communism is the same as socialism

2018-08-30 05:01:24 UTC  

socialism is the final stage of this elaborated steps

2018-08-30 05:01:43 UTC  

while communis below it

2018-08-30 05:01:59 UTC  

<:dynoSuccess:314691591484866560> ***Warning logged for nikist#9410. They were not warned.***

2018-08-30 05:02:12 UTC  

and even Marx accepts that there has to be capitalism in order to achive socialism

2018-08-30 05:04:42 UTC  

I'm pretty sure about it, but before you say something else, I invite you read all his books and texts and also to get some basic notions of logic and philosophical understanding so you can work out your common sense and your arguing methods

2018-08-30 05:05:01 UTC  

and to really analyse what hes saying

2018-08-30 05:05:03 UTC  

😄

2018-08-30 05:05:25 UTC  

g night lad

2018-08-30 05:07:13 UTC  

being natsoc is better

2018-08-30 05:08:34 UTC  

nah

2018-08-30 05:08:40 UTC  

the system constantly falls apart

2018-08-30 05:08:50 UTC  

He has a point Vic

2018-08-30 05:08:50 UTC  

natsoc system never falls apart

2018-08-30 05:08:58 UTC  

unless youre an insurrectionary type natsoc probably couldnt be implemented in anywhere but europe and countries not liberalized

2018-08-30 05:09:19 UTC  

thats naïve
all systems eventually break down

2018-08-30 05:09:32 UTC  

autocratic systems are pretty unreliable too

2018-08-30 05:09:58 UTC  

natsoc has never proven to fall apart, because everyone attacks a country with such system

2018-08-30 05:10:53 UTC  

you can prove it with a model of history
or a hypothetical

2018-08-30 05:11:19 UTC  

the only way the natsoc system ''fell apart'' was when 4 major superpowers attacked it from all the sides

2018-08-30 05:11:34 UTC  

communist system fell apart on its own, not even surrounded

2018-08-30 05:12:01 UTC  

natsoc hasnt really existed anywhere else
also thats not true
both systems were attacked
communism held out for longer

2018-08-30 05:12:15 UTC  

the 1st USSR goverment is the one i dont like, because it killed the most, and it was 80% jewish

2018-08-30 05:12:41 UTC  

yeh, stalin purged powerful jews like genrikh yagoda

2018-08-30 05:13:09 UTC  

do you want the entire USSR to be russian-less?