I am no nationalist though. Im simply stating the facts.

using language that is antagonistic to an entire subsection of the proletariat does not help our struggle towards socialism

I couldnt care less for socialism, its dead

which alternative do you prefer

Except that no one uses the word “faggot” to mean gay person anymore

The chinese have replaced the ussr's usefulness as an enemy to the west. I care no more for russia.

I do, faggot.

i assume you accept capitalism as a system of oppression and failing economic system

Maybe these classcucks, but not me

the slavs are but a sour taste in my mouth, but thats all.

Capitalism is dying

No I dont accept it as a system of oppression or failing economic system because its neither

It’s presumed to be replaced by 2060

nonsense

So get fucked, porky

Your delusions dont scare me

I have sense

If the russians were competent they'd have no trouble by now

I accept their mistakes with tsar and communism, but this is just a joke at this point

do you suppose we should maintain capitalism in its current state

its rather that or state involvement

So like state capitalism

which should only be a last resort

so im right in assuming you put no confidence in anarchist tendencies

The only time anarchy is useful is for power to rise, competent power that is.

you put no confidence in the proletariat then\

let me guess, the common people have no sense

nonsense, in life they're needed for the elite to rise and for them to become elite

I am common people

and if common people degenerate then so be it.

that is the reality of life

Capitalism is part of reality

Communism and socialism is not

Also I want to see the slavs redeem themselves, I want them to grow competent. And maybe they will, but not with putin and its current constitution.

The slavs must stand on their own two feet by themselves

Only individually will they grow truly competent

interesting perspective

i have a few fundamental objections, but i suppose thats to be expected

Speak of them then

i mean first, you havnt really made an argument. you say the proletariat is needed to "rise and for them to become **elite**", eluding to some social mobility between strata, or does this mean revolution? This is objectively false under capitalism for many reasons, the simplest being inequality