Message from @PugSlugger
Discord ID: 531920812182077472
@ACentralScrutinizer no, it isnt
It really then matters how do you want to attain that white majority
*keep rather
why would you want to retain a white majority?
restrict immigration, incentivize white birth
I don’t think it’s an inherently bad thing
Even if you aren’t a racist, people are just resistant to change
We’re familiar with a white majority America, we know what it’s like, and change is an uncertainty that most people don’t want to fuck with
Whites literally dont have a place in the world
Blacks have an entire continent
I don’t have anything against hispanics personally
but if my state went from 95% white to only 45%, I would be a little put off
@Sisyphus i think if you champion diversity that means preserving the white race. we are a global minority after all. and you could always put the shoe on the other foot for any other race too. and ensuring that we have different races means that we will be able to keep our characteristic genetic diversity that has allowed our population to survive for so long
The thing that makes a rainbow beautiful is the separation of colors combined, not all of them mixed to a dullish brown hue
(bordering on racist sentiments i know, forgive me)
Nah, I feel ya man
it wouldn’t be any fun if everywhere was an assimilated beige
it’s good to have some white places, some asian places, some hispanic places, etc
by keeping our cultures somewhat separated, we’re able to preserve what makes them great
that’s not to say that culture should be a brick wall you can’t go past
sharing cultures is half the fun
but keeping a strong sense of identity is important to keeping those cultures strong enough to be worth sharing
fuck whites
jump off a bridge kkkrackers
If you dont want browns in your country youre a racist
Never said I don’t want browns in my country
Just said that a certain balance is good
why do we need a “certain balance”?
thats precisely it. I mean thats pretty much the whole basis of tourism. Chinese tourists want to come visit the Statue of Liberty and New York, and Chicago because they want an authentic American experience not a Chinese one. Or maybe an American wants to immerse himself in Japan. Anti-Globalism.
@PugSlugger assimilation is possible, freedom of association, no discrimination or societal taboos in regards to race is ideal. But i think a solid 75% majority would be okay
Did you read what I typed a minute ago?
yes?
“it wouldn’t be any fun if everywhere was an assimilated beige”
“it’s good to have some white places, some asian places, some hispanic places, etc”
“that’s not to say that culture should be a brick wall you can’t go past
sharing cultures is half the fun
but keeping a strong sense of identity is important to keeping those cultures strong enough to be worth sharing”
that’s why i think balance is good
it allows cultures to overlap and blend without becoming completely swamped out by each other
I’m not saying we *need* it
I think a beige humanity would still be capable of surviving, and that new cultures would inevitably spring out among them
but i think it’s good to have
In theory i think America could work (or any country ran similarly) for people of any race regardless of skin color. Again i think the racial balance is to preserve white in the future. America is still currently the nation with the largest amount white people in it and being only what like 7% of the global population i think its fair to retain as a hive for white people @Sisyphus
I don’t see a problem with one race being statistically “dominant” over others.
Race does not and will not ever matter.
I mean, not true, but okay
I simply don’t give a shit.
that’s my two cents at least.
Right on man, no judgement here
So you dont care either way if america becomes 100% white or black?
No?
Okay. Thats fair. But when saying "race does not matter" do you really mean that? I mean. Imagine you're a doctor. You now have to make medical decisions. Would you really ignore the difference in the higher prevalence of sickle cell among blacks versus whites because you think there are no differing racial components at all that constitute any kind of merit to study or discuss?
Of course there are scientific exceptions to the rule