socratically

are you a revisionist

I am not going to answer that.

would you agree that idpol is revisionism?

yay or nay

I'd agree you're a fucking moron.

sniff sniff

smells like

Hello, Zizek.

no argument

And here we are screaming past one another and not getting at anything.

We really are two Zizeks.

well then let’s talk

if you wanna be serious

do you believe that idpol is revisionism

?

I tried to, it was you who went off the rails and once again I am not going to play into your framework.

That would be stupid of me. You're setting me up for a gotcha.

present an argument that isn’t ‘you’re defensive trite’

I know you're a bad faith moron.

Okay, then you're a bad faith moron.

still waiting on that argument buddy

You're an awful comrade.

But here is my argument.

still waiting on that argument buddy

you came out to me being hostile but ok

^^^

Identity Politics are linked to everything. Two bits we leftism talk about identity. Class and Consumer. These are identities we know definitely exist, but they are identities. So then why do we get worked up when other identities fall into the mix?

We claim identity politics divide the working class, but this only happens sometimes.

Race, sex, gender, and other can rip us apart if misunderstood or taken too far. You claiming idpol is toxic is rushed and poorly thought out.

What we need to do is not rip ourselves apart over this, but come to an understanding that all of these things play a role and work in tandem with one another. Black, for instance, is an identity linked to being poor and possibly criminal while white stands for being upper class and proper.

In other words, we need a mix of class consciousness and identity politics.

There, that is my argument.

By the way, worst identity is consumer.

Like those liberals who think consumption can be activism.

While I agree it is important to acknowledge the secondary contradiction of being a black american, the redditor’s emphasis on black and labeling themself as a (person of color) is literally reverse jim crow. the primary contradiction still stands. liberalism is quick and easy bandaids to much bigger problems. that being the contradiction of worker and capitalist. the BPP new this, and although routed themselves as black peoples, they acknowledged that the single most pressing issue is that of class and their relation to the MOP. By putting any issue above class, you’re engaging in liberalism as defined by Mao, and therefor you’re a revisionist who seeks a temporary problem to a solution that effects all. Black people haven’t always been the only poor people and white peoples haven’t. there are poor black and white people all over the world. blacks that own the MOP and don’t. Whites that do and don’t. by saying X group does Y, we are focusing our efforts not on capitalism but instead an issue that is the result of the primary contradiction of capitalism. Also to use idpol is unmaterialist because you’re abandoning the base for the superstructure

Fbi crime statistics

literally this server

zizek is based because he doesnt take himself seriously

zizek can’t take a solid position on anything

why is internationalism good?