Message from @Mikey

Discord ID: 660227129039912977


2019-12-27 21:04:38 UTC  

and i am of the opinion, the moment man becomes convinced he SHOULD play god, his days are numbered

2019-12-27 21:04:48 UTC  

The idea that one should destroy research kind of lands you in the same camp that opposes race realism and the bell curve findings.

2019-12-27 21:04:52 UTC  

hoping i am wrong, and you are right...

2019-12-27 21:05:18 UTC  

At no point are you condoning the usage of it

2019-12-27 21:05:25 UTC  

MA, I'll sell you my unopened original Megaforce pressing of Metallica - Kill Em All <:smugon:512048583806025739>

2019-12-27 21:05:29 UTC  

Hence political opposition and the war against the person doing said experiments

2019-12-27 21:05:34 UTC  

you are one of those.. ok, to prove i am not one that just dismisses, state your case ofr race realism

2019-12-27 21:05:34 UTC  

But if the people are dead

2019-12-27 21:05:35 UTC  

the scientists have to know that there is no happy ending for them

2019-12-27 21:05:43 UTC  

man has been surpassing god since we first started treating any ailments

2019-12-27 21:05:43 UTC  

Evolution will determine if we have a right to play god or not.

Either our playing god makes us stronger. Or it ends up killing us. Useless speculating over which it will be, so one might as well play god and find out.

2019-12-27 21:05:45 UTC  

How is it ethical to destroy the research that remains

2019-12-27 21:05:46 UTC  

NICE mikey!

2019-12-27 21:05:57 UTC  

I'll take $900

2019-12-27 21:05:58 UTC  

<:smugon:512048583806025739>

2019-12-27 21:06:20 UTC  

they have to know that if they go down the path of immoral science, even if they get a result, they're doomed

2019-12-27 21:06:23 UTC  

that's how it needs to be

2019-12-27 21:06:24 UTC  

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

2019-12-27 21:06:33 UTC  

unlikely, Proxies. More likely at this juncture, we won't get the chance to evolve much past the next major conflict

2019-12-27 21:06:46 UTC  

Science without philosophy is dangerous

2019-12-27 21:06:54 UTC  

agreed

2019-12-27 21:06:55 UTC  

<:smugon:512048583806025739>

2019-12-27 21:06:57 UTC  

Tell that to the Chinese

2019-12-27 21:07:05 UTC  

science and morality must BALANCE each other

2019-12-27 21:07:05 UTC  

Chinese are just thieves

2019-12-27 21:07:07 UTC  

*Jurassic Park theme plays*

2019-12-27 21:07:16 UTC  

They lack creativity so they siphon off the west

2019-12-27 21:07:19 UTC  

@ManAnimal that's not how reality works though

2019-12-27 21:07:22 UTC  

for now

2019-12-27 21:07:26 UTC  

we all cant agree on morality

2019-12-27 21:07:27 UTC  

@ManAnimal So?

That's evolution for you. Most species are destined to go extinct. If it proves to be our turn then so be it. We were evidently inferior as survivors if that happens.

2019-12-27 21:07:44 UTC  

true ralin, thankfully human life isn't deterministic

2019-12-27 21:07:46 UTC  

Plus evolution has largely stopped for us

2019-12-27 21:07:47 UTC  

we can CHOOSE

2019-12-27 21:07:50 UTC  

so you will get some scientists who do not see something as immoral when you do

2019-12-27 21:07:50 UTC  

Its devolution time

2019-12-27 21:07:57 UTC  

We have to take charge of our own progress

2019-12-27 21:07:59 UTC  

Or die out

2019-12-27 21:08:06 UTC  

And if we prove to actually get ourselves to go extinct through mad science, or through climate change or whatever, then all the more the justified our Darwin Award will be.

2019-12-27 21:08:30 UTC  

again, most spieces don't wonder 'why' nor have they produced the likes of Mozart and Einstein