Message from @lunemarie

Discord ID: 661384039315275806


2019-12-31 01:42:01 UTC  

I meant by force not choice, lol

2019-12-31 01:42:01 UTC  

they didn't 'produce'; they 'acquired'

2019-12-31 01:42:04 UTC  

i.e. stole

2019-12-31 01:42:17 UTC  

oh force the consitution like Japan

2019-12-31 01:42:18 UTC  

great britain pioneered what was basically industrial era slavery

2019-12-31 01:42:21 UTC  

cash cropping

2019-12-31 01:42:24 UTC  

and that sorta stuff

2019-12-31 01:42:32 UTC  

life in colonial india was very very very shitty

2019-12-31 01:42:36 UTC  

well all of europe was in complete chaos post war

2019-12-31 01:42:36 UTC  

this is also why GDP is a lousy economic indicator

2019-12-31 01:42:43 UTC  

look at the youtube channel the great war

2019-12-31 01:42:56 UTC  

the production capacity of the brits was a fraction of the US at ANY time i

2019-12-31 01:43:00 UTC  

its amazing civilization remained at all

2019-12-31 01:43:14 UTC  

In 1900 both the UK and India had larger economies than Germany, and both were part of the British empire which combined was still the worlds largest economy

2019-12-31 01:43:34 UTC  

the production capacity of the brits was greater than americca for the entire first half of the industrial revolution

2019-12-31 01:43:37 UTC  
2019-12-31 01:43:41 UTC  

yes, but by that time most of that was finacial in nature

2019-12-31 01:43:46 UTC  

By 1910 Germany surpassed both but was still less wealthy than the British empire

2019-12-31 01:43:50 UTC  

it began with the textile industry

2019-12-31 01:44:01 UTC  

new england was the first industrialized region and it took a while for it to spread

2019-12-31 01:44:02 UTC  

In 1920 Germany dropped back below for obvious reasons

2019-12-31 01:44:07 UTC  

If the UK kept India, Africa and the middle east they'd own the worlds oil and everything would be made in India instead of China, the biggest ball dropped in history and the cherry on the cake is that the anti colonialists where communists going back to the 1800s

2019-12-31 01:44:07 UTC  

meanwhile in england it spread very quickly

2019-12-31 01:44:15 UTC  

england also had the advantage of population concentration

2019-12-31 01:44:17 UTC  

'production capacity' not 'production output'

2019-12-31 01:44:22 UTC  

Dont worry we coming back <:SmugPepe:510408646807519233>

2019-12-31 01:44:23 UTC  

🇬🇧

2019-12-31 01:44:32 UTC  

which was much more ideal for transporting materialand building factories

2019-12-31 01:44:35 UTC  

Remember that India and Ghandi literally wanted to deindustrialise and return to agriculture

2019-12-31 01:44:41 UTC  

yup

2019-12-31 01:44:42 UTC  

@ManAnimal england had a bigger pop than the us for a very very long time

2019-12-31 01:44:47 UTC  

and with pop goes production

2019-12-31 01:44:51 UTC  

They would actually be an industrial state if they stayed with the UK

2019-12-31 01:44:57 UTC  

the us only had 1 million americans at the time of the revolution

2019-12-31 01:45:01 UTC  

of course, most of europe still does

2019-12-31 01:45:07 UTC  

britain had many times that

2019-12-31 01:45:13 UTC  

despite being relatively small

2019-12-31 01:45:35 UTC  

most of europe doesnt have coal deposits AND easy sea access though

2019-12-31 01:45:37 UTC  

Issue is the UK is smol

2019-12-31 01:45:38 UTC  

population density is some 30-50% greater in most european countries than in the US

2019-12-31 01:45:43 UTC  

likewise britain used their military to crush their competitors