@gNightrow No shit, retard.

I did not question meaning of 1, -1 and 0 in terms of correlation.

I question Kraut claiming that 0.1 to 0.5 is "less correlation" and then declaring that because 0.41 < 0.5, i.e **less** correlation, it's **ZERO** correlation.

**FUCKING RETARD! YOU AND KRAUT!**

0.41 is not 0.0 fucking degenerate cuck.

no need for for an ad hominem

I'm not even interested in the heterozygosity vs number of sub-species correlation but I can see when Kraut pulls a political spin on science or maths.

The fact that Kraut pissed off even people who are against Alt-Right tells a lot about how openly fallacious Kraut's arguments were, when enemies of Alt-Right cringed at Kraut ruining everything and doubling down and calling everyone else who didn't like his nonsense to be also basically nazis.

Kraut is a high-school dropout.

He doesn't know jack shit about *anything*. Some dropouts may be self-studied but Kraut doesn't even claim that.

@gNightrow

I could easily be considered "anti-SJW" and don't agree with that position or really anything the AR believes...

@gNightrow
I perceive Kraut to be shifting the 'goalpost' for (trying to) defending the already lost argument

Why?

Can't tell

Listen, literally NO ONE thinks kraut won that exchange

Not whiic, not vaush, no one

Yeah, Kraut chose to defend a biology-denialist point, which is a position you cannot win. I understand he want to prevent another Holocaust, but when Jews themselves talk about race and IQ (Sam Harris, Gad Saad, etc.)

Heck, the original of race and IQ debate was co-authored by a Jew. We only remember Charles Murray but there was another guy working on it.

/\

I don't think it's that

It’s true, though I disagree with Charles Murray

And he was wrong

Richard J. **(((Herrnstein)))**

There's too much scientifically provable data available to censor

They basically created the scientific basis for political side of neo-nazi spergery.

But neither of the scientists were nazis.

They were just co-opted.

And Kraut went to "debunk" basically The Bell Curve.

Social austerity is the mob rule in science especially in the Higher echelons

Kraut started attacking the entire field of taxonomy

Without realizing it

Yeah, Kraut basically tried to debunk Darwin himself.

But, at least we learned pregnancy of a trout is very short.

Or just another yt stuntman

Plus the book is mostly focused on class

Economic castes

Not ethnicities or race

That was only in one chapter

But people lost their shit over that single chapter

Because there is a genetic difference between rich and poor people. Rich people having higher intelligence but also more mutated and disgusting

Poorer people being low in intelligence but fit for survival