I am aware of the differences between judging a person by their group identities/ race and judging people on their individual identities, the "alt right" or the "Anti sjws" claim that on average there is a correlation between race and IQ and what you do with that information is depending whether or not you are a racist. However what Crout is focussing on is a far more nuanced position on the topic and explaining that even the correlation between race and IQ is wrong. there is a difference between the argument of whether or not someone is platformed because of a scientific position (either true or false) and the argument of the credibility of the science.
Kraut doesn't understand anything about anything. He had to go "Academics please respond", to make his video series, and got denounced by some of them for butchering their assistance of topic after publishing them.
Why? Because he just pulled arbitrary ranges where 0.1-0.5 is "less correlation" and 0.5-0.9 is "more correlation". And since it's on the "less" side of positive correlation, it's the same as 0.
I question Kraut claiming that 0.1 to 0.5 is "less correlation" and then declaring that because 0.41 < 0.5, i.e **less** correlation, it's **ZERO** correlation.
I'm not even interested in the heterozygosity vs number of sub-species correlation but I can see when Kraut pulls a political spin on science or maths.
The fact that Kraut pissed off even people who are against Alt-Right tells a lot about how openly fallacious Kraut's arguments were, when enemies of Alt-Right cringed at Kraut ruining everything and doubling down and calling everyone else who didn't like his nonsense to be also basically nazis.
Yeah, Kraut chose to defend a biology-denialist point, which is a position you cannot win. I understand he want to prevent another Holocaust, but when Jews themselves talk about race and IQ (Sam Harris, Gad Saad, etc.)
