Message from @Sq crcl

Discord ID: 654439653642076161


2019-12-11 21:26:26 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/633967335614447636/654433836326846464/edgie_boi.gif

2019-12-11 21:27:35 UTC  

Mind if I nick that?

2019-12-11 21:28:20 UTC  

Go for it
I did that too

<:why:462286147473637407>

2019-12-11 21:28:33 UTC  

Kek.

2019-12-11 21:28:36 UTC  

Cheers m8

2019-12-11 21:28:42 UTC  

Always

2019-12-11 21:28:55 UTC  

Blue coca cola

2019-12-11 21:29:33 UTC  

Now I have even less incentive to drink Coke.

2019-12-11 21:29:35 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/633967335614447636/654434631491518503/image0.jpg

2019-12-11 21:44:59 UTC  

Oh,

2019-12-11 21:45:10 UTC  

But wait,

2019-12-11 21:45:14 UTC  

Shall I

2019-12-11 21:45:25 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/633967335614447636/654438609985994752/THECIA.png

2019-12-11 21:45:40 UTC  

A piece of paper turd-classifiation

2019-12-11 21:45:46 UTC  

Bs

2019-12-11 21:45:54 UTC  

Oof.

2019-12-11 21:45:54 UTC  

None of it makes sense

2019-12-11 21:47:33 UTC  

Are those real letters?

2019-12-11 21:49:26 UTC  

(not high or anything)

2019-12-11 21:49:32 UTC  

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

2019-12-11 21:49:47 UTC  

🇸 🇸 🇸 👌

2019-12-11 22:05:27 UTC  
2019-12-11 22:09:56 UTC  

^This is a good video despite the dislike ratio, I like when the left give a argument rather than REEEEE!

2019-12-11 22:25:33 UTC  

That was a shit counterargument to Alt-Hype's autism and mental retardation.

2019-12-11 22:26:12 UTC  

@gNightrow Actual arguments would be more like: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HQ90iSGpJM

2019-12-11 22:28:25 UTC  

Simple @gNightrow
Hahaha

2019-12-11 22:28:32 UTC  

No, it's not simple

2019-12-11 22:28:53 UTC  

But you can simplify it

2019-12-11 22:29:47 UTC  

Ie. I can be shown twice as many researchers and their papers German style, index attached everything neat and full

2019-12-11 22:30:12 UTC  

However



If me you anyone is constantly having

2019-12-11 22:30:23 UTC  

An empirical experience called :

2019-12-11 22:31:20 UTC  

.



Different groups of people tend to be different in the way they act, the types of choices they tend to make

2019-12-11 22:32:37 UTC  

.


All I can say is that the research papers don't match a shared empirical common everyday experience

2019-12-11 22:33:32 UTC  

And so far I haven't even attacked or defended any sides

2019-12-11 22:33:55 UTC  

.

Water is wet

2019-12-11 22:35:51 UTC  

Hold on...

"^This is a good video despite the dislike ratio, I like when the left give a argument rather than REEEEE!"


<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

It all makes sense now

2019-12-11 22:49:44 UTC  

I am aware of the differences between judging a person by their group identities/ race and judging people on their individual identities, the "alt right" or the "Anti sjws" claim that on average there is a correlation between race and IQ and what you do with that information is depending whether or not you are a racist. However what Crout is focussing on is a far more nuanced position on the topic and explaining that even the correlation between race and IQ is wrong. there is a difference between the argument of whether or not someone is platformed because of a scientific position (either true or false) and the argument of the credibility of the science.

2019-12-11 22:54:04 UTC  

Kraut doesn't understand anything about anything. He had to go "Academics please respond", to make his video series, and got denounced by some of them for butchering their assistance of topic after publishing them.

2019-12-11 22:55:38 UTC  

1 = full correlation, -1 = full negative correlation, 0 = no correlaction
So based on this Kraut claims 0.41 is no correlation.

2019-12-11 22:56:34 UTC  

Why? Because he just pulled arbitrary ranges where 0.1-0.5 is "less correlation" and 0.5-0.9 is "more correlation". And since it's on the "less" side of positive correlation, it's the same as 0.