I recommend you this article: https://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/the-validity-of-iq/

Ford, you deal with the femoid.

Because the internet isn't chock-full to bursting of high-IQ people who are total idiots and wear the number like a shield.

Oh those people are lying

I'm talking about documented statistical evidence, not self professed IQ scores

Don’t believe people who say that shit

IQ is the best proxy for the g factor

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G_factor_(psychometrics)

What we're really interested in is the g factor

g can be roughly said to be the "innate problem solving ability" of a person, which is the underlying basis for "intelligence"

Different subtests of the IQ test have different g loadings, as illustrated in the following

A test with higher g loading correlates with other test taking ability in a cognitively complex task. For instance, if you score high on, say, backward digit span, you are more likely to score high on another test with a high g loading etc.

Whereas tests with lower g loading are more malleable

This is why it is significant that the lowering of IQ scores is genotypic, since that means if you placed people from 1890s USA and raised them from birth in today's environment, they'dd have a 14 point higher IQ, on average, than today's people

The above rise in IQ is mainly in subtests with high g loading

While the nominal rise in IQ from Flynn Effect is in subtests with low g loading

A while ago, Nassim Taleb tried to half heatedly attack IQ tests, the following is a great response to that

https://ideasanddata.wordpress.com/2019/01/08/nassim-taleb-on-iq/

@JaceRex "I remember reading a study showing how lesbians act closer to men, and instead see men as a competitor"What people are not aware about how much power they have in the movement and who are the primary contributors to feminist thought and theory.

https://www.goodreads.com/shelf/show/feminist-theory

not supprised at all

Those are the most popular feminist works okay and if you notice something they're all lesbians. Literally all of them.

yup

Back in the day they were in the closet. Or sometimes even had a relationship with men but didn't realize that their contempt was a part of them being lesbian

lgbt stuff when i was in school in early 2000's was bad, worse now

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BE1OP_f-j10

Notice what they're obsessed with?

attack men, to make girls think they are only safe around other girls

Heterosexual women do not try to brand intercourse as rape. They don't go around behind the scenes demonizing men in the eyes of women as a form of picking up women. They do that.

The most extreme claims always come from the lesbian demographic. It's not a coincidence that the more radical the feminist the more likely a lesbian.

Historically and even now sometimes they will pretend to be bisexual or even heterosexual only so they can speak on those relationships when they are obviously not or didn't discover till later that they were lesbians

yup

dealt with one in college (the later)

"they will pretend to be bisexual or even heterosexual" just to get girls night

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2&v=VGDfCQmKuPA&feature=emb_title

Now we can recognize right away this is a lesbian but back then we couldn't. They would have children and pass but when you look back knowing their behaviour you can see it

Sure she became a feminist separatist who ended up living on an island with only lesbians just to be separate from men. But she's pretending to be heterosexual here