Rofl

ew

@Monstrous Moonshine hope this helps

<:why:462286147473637407>

You should have sent those in DMs

*smugly laughs*

Now you’re gonna get celled for sharing cells convos lol

Why? There isn’t a rule against it

Weez literally got banned for it bro

Wait, really?

I think it's a Discord rule?

@snake Delete it before they see

Gah, whatever

No use unfortunately

Which part did you think is pseudoscience though? @Muzical

Whole thing

Weez was a troublemaker however, so you should just get off with a wrist slap if you are to be celled

The IQ drop is literally documented, you can read the paper if you want

It's not even universally accepted that IQ is a valid measure of anything.

Maybe he doesn’t believe in IQ.

I'm a she...

Ah, there we go.

NO EGIRLS

/\

IQ is a good measure of a lot of things tho

🙄

I recommend you this article: https://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/the-validity-of-iq/

Ford, you deal with the femoid.

Because the internet isn't chock-full to bursting of high-IQ people who are total idiots and wear the number like a shield.

Oh those people are lying

I'm talking about documented statistical evidence, not self professed IQ scores

Don’t believe people who say that shit

IQ is the best proxy for the g factor

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G_factor_(psychometrics)

What we're really interested in is the g factor

g can be roughly said to be the "innate problem solving ability" of a person, which is the underlying basis for "intelligence"

Different subtests of the IQ test have different g loadings, as illustrated in the following

A test with higher g loading correlates with other test taking ability in a cognitively complex task. For instance, if you score high on, say, backward digit span, you are more likely to score high on another test with a high g loading etc.

Whereas tests with lower g loading are more malleable