@Metahuman1 the reason it went that way is likely not why you think

Also you place yourself on the same side as a guy with a different definition

@Ethreen42 Your in here defending socailisum as anythign other than a morally bankrupt failed cancerouss ideology that just won't die and is still a plauge on humanity.

And your calling me small brained? Right. You clearly don't watch the guy who runs the server, or anyone he's regularly on video with. On that note, gonna turn in for the night, some of us aren't socialists, and have to work in the moring for a living.

Still haven't gotten a good explanation of what a "international dictatorship of the proletariat" would look like. @Carlisto

Fucking fireworks at Disneyland. XD

It'd look like shit anyway

1. Theosophy
2. Eugenics (see above)
3. Noone really wants socialism so the state must impose it
4. Therefore they become a fascist state
5. The needs of the state take priority
6. Retsrds and invalids are burdens
7. Etc etc

That's our best guess, yes. @Carlisto

Fucking roads you yard, your fucking roads are socialised

It's not because of nationalism, but it is partly because of socialism. The 2 combined don't work

I don't think meta knows what "socialistic elements" are

National Libertarianism is where it's at

Christ Metahuman is a retard

Socialistic elements are interesting, still I've very little trust of the Gov't to properly minister them.

Said the Commie.

@Kealor I don't think @Ethreen42 does either

Good night.

"U R DEFENDING SOCIALZM!!11!!!" you're making it sounds like I just defended stalin or something, all i said was that certain elements of socialism could work

Ethreen didn't elaborate when asked so 🤷‍♂️

You ever see how pissy Sweden gets when Bernie calls them socialists?

At least on the *national* level.

You're either socialist or not and socialism doesn't work. When they were socialists they were failing, things got better with applied capitalism

I was using the american definition because most people here are americans @Jack of Trades

@Laucivol any socialism

@Ethreen42 and you're still wrong

The American definition doesn't work

Socialism is poorly defined by most

Le americano....... esclavo de israel

I'm of the mind to agree, that it appears that as you say any socialism fails. @Jack of Trades

A very simple way would be to imagine a straight line between ancapistan and soviet Russia

@Laucivol it cannot work, which is why I don't fear China

*mounts @Kealor*

China still feels kinda fascist to me tbh

More like corporate fascism though, it's what ancapistan turns into before the collapse i imagine

@Kealor that's where your fail to understand

Also get off of me furry before I get out Ze flammenwaffer

Socialist countries ARE fascist

They HAVE to be in order to maintain socialism

Ehhhhhhh

@Kealor nope, you're getting horse cock

I'm can agree with the horseshoe