Message from @SimonTV

Discord ID: 653779079581138944


2019-12-10 02:02:27 UTC  

and externalize their problems

2019-12-10 02:02:27 UTC  

you think ethno nationalists dont redefine jews as rats?

2019-12-10 02:02:29 UTC  

interesting

2019-12-10 02:02:34 UTC  

I'm not redefining fundamentals. I'm trying to play the system to shoot holes in Manimal's premise

2019-12-10 02:02:47 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/633966934622208031/653778609571495958/socialismworks.png

2019-12-10 02:02:52 UTC  

you aren't even addressing fundamentals

2019-12-10 02:02:53 UTC  

hahah commie fag

2019-12-10 02:02:56 UTC  

if you don't hold self ownership as a natural right then what is it?

2019-12-10 02:02:59 UTC  

you are addressing abstractions

2019-12-10 02:03:02 UTC  

thank you, that'd be my defensive point.

2019-12-10 02:03:14 UTC  

anyway

2019-12-10 02:03:41 UTC  

ownership like any other 'right' is the function of the agreeement a gov makes with it's people

2019-12-10 02:03:52 UTC  

in exchange for the monopoly on force

2019-12-10 02:04:02 UTC  

Hypotheticals and other situationally egregious arguments (like my favorite, the Burning IVF Clinic) are not reflective of reality and all options you can take.

2019-12-10 02:04:12 UTC  

I don't like them as rhetorical techniques.

2019-12-10 02:04:15 UTC  

Frankly I wish they'd die off.

2019-12-10 02:04:18 UTC  

the condition is to enforce the rights entailed uniformly

2019-12-10 02:04:21 UTC  

so if you are on a deserted location, like in the jungle, with no government around to protect you, do you have no rights?

2019-12-10 02:04:29 UTC  

it's a function of a contract

2019-12-10 02:04:36 UTC  

not something that exists in nature

2019-12-10 02:04:39 UTC  

there is no contract with government

2019-12-10 02:04:43 UTC  

yes there is

2019-12-10 02:04:46 UTC  

lol

2019-12-10 02:04:49 UTC  

So, in your estimate MA, rights - and we're talking life liberty & the pursuit of happiness level - are functionally provided by the Gov't?

2019-12-10 02:04:50 UTC  

it's called a constitution

2019-12-10 02:04:56 UTC  

only the US has that

2019-12-10 02:05:05 UTC  

big cock libertarians enter the chat

2019-12-10 02:05:08 UTC  

they aren' t 'provided'

2019-12-10 02:05:10 UTC  

It's also known as a "social contract."

2019-12-10 02:05:20 UTC  

social contract is not a contract

2019-12-10 02:05:24 UTC  

it doesn't exist

2019-12-10 02:05:25 UTC  

they are a CONDITION

2019-12-10 02:05:32 UTC  

moving goal posts

2019-12-10 02:05:39 UTC  

Thus, are inherent?

2019-12-10 02:05:46 UTC  

if the gov doesn't protect the rights of the people, the people have a responsiblity to REPLACE that gov

2019-12-10 02:06:09 UTC  

the government role is to protect the inalienable rights, they have just taken that way too far

2019-12-10 02:06:17 UTC  

no gov that simply dismisses those rights is legitimate; that's the catch

2019-12-10 02:06:40 UTC  

governments exist to protecc rights

2019-12-10 02:06:40 UTC  

The question is where does the *impetus* of rights derive from then?

2019-12-10 02:07:05 UTC  

but treating the rights like they have no COST or are unconditional will inevitable result in entitlement and thinking they don't require constant vigilance

2019-12-10 02:07:17 UTC  

this perspective will ALWAYS result in LOSING those rights