Message from @Chuckler

Discord ID: 653781523987955716


2019-12-10 02:09:26 UTC  

yeah

2019-12-10 02:09:45 UTC  

natural law in that context is natural law (as in legal)

2019-12-10 02:10:22 UTC  

as with all things legal, starting by introducing ambiguity where it is not required

2019-12-10 02:10:35 UTC  

Gravity is a law you cannot break

2019-12-10 02:11:15 UTC  

what the courts suggest is 'natural law' completely fall away when there is no government or courts to uphold them

2019-12-10 02:11:22 UTC  

they are abstractions

2019-12-10 02:11:28 UTC  

unique to the human experience

2019-12-10 02:11:32 UTC  

not reaity

2019-12-10 02:11:36 UTC  

Speak for yourself, MA.. I defy gravity all the time. XD

2019-12-10 02:11:38 UTC  

the history of law (legal) is before modern governments

2019-12-10 02:11:54 UTC  

common law was law that natural law that became accepted through precedent

2019-12-10 02:11:55 UTC  

i know this

2019-12-10 02:12:00 UTC  

(Sorry, I couldn't help myself.)

2019-12-10 02:12:13 UTC  

so then how can you call it not reality

2019-12-10 02:12:18 UTC  

however, it stands in direct conflict with the dominant philosophy of the day

2019-12-10 02:12:25 UTC  

natural philosophy

2019-12-10 02:12:34 UTC  

the original name for 'Science'

2019-12-10 02:13:10 UTC  

we are either individuals capable of negotiating reality ourselves OR we are authority driven, requiring laws

2019-12-10 02:13:56 UTC  

it's a bit of a contradiction to place sceince as the highest standard yet priorities 'the law of man' over 'the law of nature'

2019-12-10 02:13:59 UTC  

yea I am not seeing this dichotomy

2019-12-10 02:14:21 UTC  

Reality = That which once you stop believing in it _still exists_

2019-12-10 02:14:29 UTC  

I think you are confusing the word "law" with other uses of the word

2019-12-10 02:14:42 UTC  

it's not as much a dichotomy as it is an insistance on using terms that no longer apply

2019-12-10 02:15:01 UTC  

our modern legal system is still based on common law

2019-12-10 02:15:15 UTC  

call it what you will; just call it something that doesn't interfere with other concepts

2019-12-10 02:15:25 UTC  

that is just semantics

2019-12-10 02:15:32 UTC  

calling it 'natural law' tramples of this thing called 'science'

2019-12-10 02:15:51 UTC  

everything complicated always comes down to semantics

2019-12-10 02:16:01 UTC  

"Our" might be inaccurate on an international platform

2019-12-10 02:16:21 UTC  

fortunately, in the STEM world unlike in the Legal World, we can express everything in terms of math

2019-12-10 02:17:30 UTC  

Attorneys don't like it when you point out that 'facts change'

2019-12-10 02:17:36 UTC  

Is Pluto a planet?

2019-12-10 02:17:48 UTC  

Is the year 1995 or 2019?

2019-12-10 02:19:29 UTC  

Yes, it's still a planet, damnit

2019-12-10 02:19:43 UTC  

lol

2019-12-10 02:20:17 UTC  

It may now be classified as a *dwarf* planet.. but it's still a planet.

2019-12-10 02:20:21 UTC  

Pluto is not a planet

2019-12-10 02:20:54 UTC  

That's what (((they))) want you to believe. @Peri The Platypus

2019-12-10 02:20:57 UTC  

the government

2019-12-10 02:22:12 UTC  

Anti-Semite

2019-12-10 02:22:12 UTC  

A dwarf planet is no less a planet than dwarves are people