I answered finally, what do you think?

I meant he should pivot rather then get bogged down in not answering

These as if you can just group people together like that as if it means anything.

@JaIsCool so you want the t1 diabetic to die as the tranny is allowed to not feel bad about living in "the wrong body"

Yesm

yeesh

Natural selection.

then you wouldn't give the $1k to the tranny

200iq play

nah both the tranny and the diabetic wont breed

God wanted the diabetic to die. God wanted the tranny to be a girl.

The thing with funding trans things is that they are 0.30 percent of the population so there isn't a lot of people to actually sink money

tbh so true

Not that I think public funds should be going towards optional surgery

Yeah, surgery is what, 20k or something iirc?

you could probably cover all the trans pepple in america for less than 2 million.

There are massive hundred million dollar trans organisations they could totally fund all the transgenders in say the US to get free surgery

Thats just the people who want surgury, a shit load of trans people don't want surgery.

It'd be higher then that but it'd be pretty low still

Easily doable but there isn't an argument for spending that money on them though

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/412190473042657280/654891539507445772/68db19345d73c913fcbaaacfe48045a78cac51c9952e63d2803f36e9187d8287_1.mp4

The only argment there needs to be is "Do you give a shit?"

Like hungry people get money because they can't afford food and homeless get housing but there is no rational motivation behind free surgery behind "I am for trans people therefor"

You chose the tranny over the t1

you gave the tranny the $1k

There is no moral argument for funding them

Other then lowering the suicide rate **maybe**

I know. The god thing was a joke obviously. <:pepogiggle:412663157228699659>

I know

**NIGGERS**

There is a moral argument. That argument being "Why not?"

I just made you break your script though

All giving free trans surgery is, is appealing to your political base and special interest groups

😉

Not that morals are objective.

Which is a position based on party politics and nothing else

There is objectivity in them though, and a subjective element.

Like giving subsidies to farmers because they vote for you

Id pay for all trans expenses if I had the money.

trans medication are not as important as t1

if there is welfare, they do not deserve as much