Message from @Gromp

Discord ID: 650362966327164941


2019-11-30 15:40:46 UTC  

Progressivism means the rejection of tradition, not new tech

2019-11-30 15:41:01 UTC  

Internationalism is gay regardless of what marx said

2019-11-30 15:42:01 UTC  

Kinda but traditionalism is mostly holding technological progress back yk, as to internationalism; well that’s where our viewpoints fundamentally diverge; you want to keep the state I want to let it wither away eventually

2019-11-30 15:42:39 UTC  

And spread the revolution as far and wide as possible

2019-11-30 15:43:07 UTC  

Nations are a naturally forming phenomenon and each nation forms its own traditions. Some of these traditions are different, but often times far apart nations hold the same values.

2019-11-30 15:43:26 UTC  

Traditionalism is the embrace of these values.

2019-11-30 15:43:55 UTC  

I’m not saying you’re not allowed to have those; I just think they should play no great part in politics

2019-11-30 15:44:45 UTC  

Why? A country needs a culture and that's why you need some traditions.

2019-11-30 15:44:49 UTC  

You need values

2019-11-30 15:45:35 UTC  

You can have them without the state, states merely came to embody these values they did not create them

2019-11-30 15:46:04 UTC  

Yes. So why not have a state embody the values through policy?

2019-11-30 15:46:34 UTC  

Because the debate should be a cultural level not a state level one

2019-11-30 15:46:47 UTC  

It should be decided by the people

2019-11-30 15:47:22 UTC  

Just because something is popular, doesn't mean something is right.

2019-11-30 15:47:31 UTC  

Modern society clearly shows this

2019-11-30 15:47:47 UTC  

Well that’s what traditions are tho

2019-11-30 15:47:52 UTC  

Unpopular ones just die out

2019-11-30 15:47:58 UTC  

People only keep what they like

2019-11-30 15:49:23 UTC  

If no one follows a tradition it dies out, true. But in the modern world you can see many traditions remain but are only followed by some people. Essentially any revolutionary government would have the option to save these traditions by promoting them or enforcing them.

2019-11-30 15:49:45 UTC  

Leaving it to the people won't necessarily give you the right choice.

2019-11-30 15:50:14 UTC  

Xactly but I see no inherent value in them hence my conviction of leaving it at a cultural level

2019-11-30 15:52:37 UTC  

If there's no inherent value then why are they so universal? Most traditional values have value. Honour for instance, it was a way to draw a line between legitimate acts of revenge, plus warfare and crime or murder.

2019-11-30 15:52:59 UTC  

It was in a way an ancient geneva convention lol

2019-11-30 15:53:41 UTC  

Yea but by now “honor” is codified, you’ve got laws, courts and conventions to cull excesses. They outlived their usefulness

2019-11-30 15:53:59 UTC  

There may be need for honor at an individual level

2019-11-30 15:54:19 UTC  

To keep going or rationalize behavior

2019-11-30 15:54:23 UTC  

But not a state one

2019-11-30 15:55:57 UTC  

Exactly. Just because somethinf is written in law doesn't mean people agree with it. Honour was and is something which an individual believes in and does regardless of laws. If the state collapsed tomorrow, a moral and honourable person would continue to not kill and steal whereas many might resort to that as no one is stopping them.

2019-11-30 15:56:43 UTC  

How many people in the modern day are really morally opposed to stealing? What if they needed the food?

2019-11-30 15:57:59 UTC  

Are you actually tryna tell me that before modern times no one ever looked out for number one first and foremost? History clearly shows otherwise

2019-11-30 15:58:20 UTC  

Also again: I’m not opposed to the concept of honor or whatever at an individual level

2019-11-30 15:58:22 UTC  

Just a state one

2019-11-30 15:59:55 UTC  

Not everyone in ancient times was honourable, but honour was a concept which more people held because it was culturally embedded. I hear what you're saying, but thay leaves no guarantee people will actually embrace the concept.

2019-11-30 16:12:04 UTC  

No matter how hard you instill it into people: if the only foods is on another’s pouch people will eventually resort to stealing it. That’s just how it works when the only choice is between you or someone else going hungry.
Mean it’s certainly a noble concept and I think it’s admirable that you put so much thought onto people acting moral but I personally think the state should be more concerned with the welfare of its people rather than some abstract concept that’ll only come into play if the state crumbles

2019-11-30 16:12:43 UTC  

I’d much rather make people act morally by letting them live good lives than drilling the concept into their heads

2019-11-30 16:13:02 UTC  

May be somewhat idealist but yea

2019-11-30 18:37:28 UTC  

Culture is top down, not ground up. The institutions governing and pervading society are what determine culture and such.

2019-12-01 05:39:52 UTC  

@Gromp You make the mistake of assuming you cannot combine social tradition with technological innovation

2019-12-01 10:07:33 UTC  

Not saying that, my main problem with them are the other reasons I outlined above they just seem to hinder technological progress from what I’ve seen @Maksim

2019-12-01 10:08:06 UTC  

@Gromp "Anecdotal Evidence"