Message from @Wubbzo
Discord ID: 618266798466269184
Romans 1:24-27 ESV
**Romans 1:24-27 - English Standard Version (ESV)**
```Dust
<24> Therefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, to the dishonoring of their bodies among themselves, <25> because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever! Amen. <26> For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; <27> and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error. ```
Romans 1:32 ESV
**Romans 1:32 - English Standard Version (ESV)**
```Dust
<32> Though they know God's righteous decree that those who practice such things deserve to die, they not only do them but give approval to those who practice them. ```
walter
<@&588707615643795456> Daily Question ✝
- What is your stance on seperation of church and state? Theocracy vs Secularism?
Theocracy based
Secularism.
Church and state should be separated
state atheism
lol no
Something similar to the Constitution, free practice of all religions. HOWEVER, if a church is found to have components of/against the state they are not allowed to practice without a heavy tax placed upon them.
the tax would be something the founding father would hate, as its purpose is to strangle the church into submission of the state.
ban on mormonism, judaism, atheism, and jehovas witnesses imo
and evangelicalism
how
atheism is the future
it's immoral
LOL what moral claim does it make that you consider "immoral"
one atheist claims that genocide is immoral
and one claims it is moral
who is right and who is wrong?
ughhh do I have to explain this again?
like I said, atheism does not make any moral claims
atheism itself
exactly
is simply the lack of belief in God
it has no moral claim
that's why it's bad
so we should subjugate ourselves to 1000+ year old arbitrary moral claims?
literally if we made up a religion it would still be better than the lack of religion all together
rather than focusing on the moral claims of a belief, you should focus on whether or not it is logical or true
there is not a fucking shred of evidence for God, therefore its logical to not believe in him
The ~~bible~~ all Abrahamic religions makes dumbass claims in the old T which have been proven wrong (of course most modern Christians like to play them off as "ITS JUST A STORY OMG")
that's irrelevant
I'm literally stating
that any religion would be better foundationally than none
Religion is an intellectual handicap
yes and it would help people to be moral