But at this point you cannot be an atheist

So far all you established is that there is a pure act

And it's necessary ramifications

Immutability, unity, etc

Perhaps im not understanding, I do science, not philosophy

Maybe you are not, it took me 4 books before I accepted the argument

I didn't have anyone to explain why "x criticism" isn't right

wat

I'm saying it's a much more philosophically heavy argument than Dawkins or Hitchens thought

So it's understandable you wouldn't get it

I barely understand what Matt Dillahunty is saying half the time lole

If you watch Ed Feser debate this, he sounds like he lives in a library

New atheists like even Matt typically are not acquainted with the scholastics or other academic theologians

They'll debate at max William Lane Craig, who has weak arguments often

his arguments are a joke

lol

You would think that a God would make evidence of his existance obvious

Christians would not have to resort to nonsense like presuppositionalism

Read a theologian or something, all of these points were debated centuries ago really

I can barely get through a fiction book

Lol

I read *SCINECE*

now the biggest problem I have with Christianity is its false claims

and trust me, there are a shitton of them

Allegorical?

are the 10 commandments allegorical?

No

ok then where did they come from?

God

yea but how did he tell us

thats what i mean

He told Moses on the mountain and engraved them on the tablets

hmm now what was he doing on the mountain?

oh yea, exodus

going from Egypt correct?

Yessir

strangely enough, the Egyptians never once mention a mass enslavement of the Hebrews

or the plagues

or moses

We have no way to know

nor is there any archeological evidence they were ever there!