*"According to Everett, the Pirahã have no concept of a supreme spirit or god,[9] and they lost interest in Jesus when they discovered that Everett had never seen him. They require evidence based on personal experience for every claim made.[6] However, they do believe in spirits that can sometimes take on the shape of things in the environment. These spirits can be jaguars, trees, or other visible, tangible things including people.[5](pp112,134–142) Everett reported one incident where the Pirahã said that “Xigagaí, one of the beings that lives above the clouds, was standing on a beach yelling at us, telling us that he would kill us if we go into the jungle.” Everett and his daughter could see nothing and yet the Pirahã insisted that Xigagaí was still on the beach.[5](ppxvi-xvii)"*

ok, well tell god that he forgot a few people

Ironic. They wouldn't believe in the big bang either

Cool people

perhaps not

though unlike god, the big bang has evidence

There's only like 800 of them

"I don't personally expirence it so it's false"

Big bang btfo

my point was that there are people with no concept of a god

thats it

lol

@Riley the Big bang is a retarded theory. It's an event with no named cause

the big bang theory doesnt describe a cause

It should

it simply describes the expansion of the unvierse

We see things in the world that vary in degrees of goodness, truth, nobility, etc. For example, well-drawn circles are better than poorly drawn ones, healthy animals are better than sick animals. Moreover, some substances are better than others, since living things are better than non-living things, and animals are better than plants, in testimony of which no one would choose to lose their senses for the sake of having the longevity of a tree. But judging something as being "more" or "less" implies some standard against which it is being judged. For example in a room full of people of varying heights, at least one must be tallest. Therefore, there is something which is best and most true, and most a being, etc. Aquinas then adds the premise: what is most in a genus is the cause of all else in that genus. From this he deduces that there exists some most-good being which causes goodness in all else, and this everyone understands to be God.

I find this to be

Very interesting

Personally

For something to happen you need means @Riley

we know it happened, but we dont know the means

I know lightning happens, but i don't know how

How do you know the big bang wasn't god? It seems like that makes more sense than it just happened

i don't know it wasnt god

i havent ruled that out

however

@Riley Charged particles in clouds

there isnt evidence for this

Build up of charged particles

@Riley light is observable the big bang is a claim made. I won't believe it just happened by itself

we don't know anything before the planck era

inb4 red shift

redshift does demonstrate an expansion of space, yes

and get this

the CMB proves that the universe was once very dense, hot, and uniform

hmmm

so the universe use to be very dense and hot

and uniform

and its currently expanding

...what if