Yes

Howdy my nigga

hello n word

<:garfilf:606968189640769668>

"Wait you actually want Sharia law in the United States?"

"Yes"

<:Chad:591182354270257170>

The Bible is clear purpose of the state is too punish evil and promote good the opposite of the libertarian and liberal states. I find it is most compatible with states based off of fascist thought.

Natural selection will do its job more efficiently without the state

"Degeneracy" will be purged through vigilante groups or the consequences of their actions

Yeah but what if they just overpower the vigilante groups?

By natural law they can't

Why?

If a group of people who do or defend something you find degenerate has more people and or better weapons, and they win

Then what?

You regroup, and fight again

People die in fights

If they kill all the vigilantes there won't be any left

Are you arguing for anarchism anyway?

Degenerates won't win @A Russian Bad Actor

God wills it!

o

Proverbs 28:8

Outnumbered @A Russian Bad Actor

Religion should have no involvement in the government, nor influence it.

Religion, most of the times, promotes ethical actions and activities, but the Government has to take unethical actions in order for the nation to go forward.

Of course Governments can decide to, for example, cut taxation for Churches and such, but no Church should have involvement in the Government.

Cringe take

ok boomer

im fine with a palamentarian government but it needs to be much more direct in its democracy like how it is now its shit

^

Bible promotes monarchy, but with certain freedoms for the people

So probably constitutional divine monarchy?

really?

in what way?

i mean its not the worst its just really risky

The Bible was written so many centuries ago. The world hadn't seen any just democracy. Only the Athenian Democracy, which wasn't that much of a democracy if you think about it.
The more the time passes, the more contemporary religions should become. Otherwise, at a point, religions will become too irrelevant and lose their followers.

>trying to argue what a religion says without being part of that religion

I've read about the religion well enough.

I'm sure you will do a good job of interpreting scripture